Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #992 from usds/staging
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
add equity blog
  • Loading branch information
amwhitty authored Jun 25, 2024
2 parents 924b7e7 + bc901b5 commit 5557213
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 89 additions and 0 deletions.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
---
# Page template info (DO NOT EDIT)
layout: default
blog_page: true

# Carousel (Edit this)
carousel_title: "Grounding in community: positioning government for a meaningful relationship with its public"
carousel_summary: "How might the combination of your own lived experiences impact the way you understand the people you're serving?"
# partial path to image
carousel_image: /_news-and-blog/2024-06-25-positioning-government-for-a-meaningful-relationship-with-its-public/positioning-government.jpg
# accessibility text for image
carousel_image_alt_text: "A graphic pattern including many silhouettes of the human heads in varying shades of blue"
# should show on news and blog page. ordered by date prefix in filename
carousel_show: true
# Blog detail page (Edit this)
title: "Grounding in community: positioning government for a meaningful relationship with its public"
dateline_str: "Jun 25, 2024"
readtime_str: "3"
byline_str: "Celeste Espinoza, Jeremy Zitomer, Alex Bornkessel, Natasha Jamal"
permalink: /news-and-blog/positioning-government-for-a-meaningful-relationship-with-its-public
---

The U.S. Digital Service (USDS) has spent nearly a decade [demonstrating](https://www.usds.gov/impact-report/2024/) how agile, human-centered approaches can improve government products and services for millions. USDS’s human-centered approach focuses on “the greatest good for the greatest number of people in the greatest need.” Our success as civil servants comes from how we serve the public, not metrics of success we define for ourselves. At USDS, there are several approaches that we use to guide our work, including those below.



## 1. Recognizing Our Gaps

### The communities we serve are more than research subjects, and they deserve to be seen in their whole selves.



<blockquote class="pullquote" markdown="1">
How might the combination of your own lived experiences impact the way you understand the people you're serving?
</blockquote>


One of the [six USDS values](https://www.usds.gov/values.html) is “hire and empower great people.” As part of this, we strive to create teams that reflect the diversity of the public that we serve—however, we know that lived experiences are complex and multifaceted, and we can't always be a perfect reflection. We recommend that teams use tools to help them recognize gaps between themselves and the people they serve. For example, positionality tools may allow us to better understand the limits of our own perspectives, identify whose voices may be missing, and become more intentional about including those most affected by a product or service.



## 2. **Building Relationships**

### A critical aspect of customer experience is how people \*feel\* about the product or service and the people who provide it.



<blockquote class="pullquote" markdown="1">
What actions can you take to identify communities experiencing relevant challenges, and then reflect their voices and experience in your product decisions?
</blockquote>


Another [USDS value](https://www.usds.gov/values.html) is to “design with users, not for them.” Customer experience success is about building a relationship with the customer—and in our work, strong relationships allow technologists and the public to co-develop tools that deliver value. Building on various [public participation frameworks](https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide-process-planning){:target="_blank"}, USDS encourages a relationship-building approach that encourages our teams to do more than just inform or consult people we serve and truly work to involve, collaborate, and co-design with them. Better outcomes are possible when we prioritize the needs and voices of the public in our work, one step at a time—this includes navigating bureaucracy and stakeholder dynamics in pursuit of [community engagement](https://www.performance.gov/participation/){:target="blank"} and relationship-building with the people our programs serve.



## 3. Understanding the Problem

### *Understanding the problem* and not jumping to a solution - digital or otherwise - pushes us to pause and consider how we can take deliberate action with vision and impact.




<blockquote class="pullquote" markdown="1">
How do you maximize the impact of what you can do now and what you can do later, while acknowledging the things outside of your control?
</blockquote>


USDS receives more requests for help from Federal agencies than we can accommodate. To make the most impact, we need to be rigorous in articulating what problem we are trying to solve, and for whom (a seemingly simple, but often overlooked step). We then have to match that problem with the right service and technology solutions, and realistically work toward those with agencies.

This means digging into [root causes](https://guides.18f.gov/methods/discover/five-whys/){:target="_blank"} and finding the ideal approach that yields the most impact now and in the future. When teams define their scope, they should focus on reducing overall burden for the public and creating solutions that help the most people overcome the most pressing barriers. Ultimately, we must go beyond asking whether a solution works, and instead ask “for whom” the solution is working, who is being left out, and whether we’re meeting people’s most pressing needs.



<center>***</center>



In the spirit of human-centered design and iterative processes, USDS has been testing our tools and approaches across the civic tech community. We encourage you to try some of the approaches and tools we shared above and [reach out](mailto:[email protected]) with further thoughts and feedback.

**Some additional resources to support the approaches described above**

Note: we are not endorsing any of these, but want to provide some options for teams to consider

[MIT Teaching + Learning Lab // Identities & Positionality](https://tll.mit.edu/teaching-resources/inclusive-classroom/identities-positionality/){:target="blank"}

[The Journal of User Experience // Invited Essay: Learning to Recognize Exclusion](https://uxpajournal.org/learning-recognize-exclusion/){:target="blank"}

[Urban Institute // Exploring Individual and Organizational Positionality Toolkit](https://www.urban.org/research/publication/exploring-individual-and-institutional-positionality){:target="_blank"}
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.

0 comments on commit 5557213

Please sign in to comment.