Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for passing DB Name #19

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tnelson-doghouse
Copy link
Contributor

Dockerfile: Made it add everything from the builder/ directory, not just mariadb.Dockerfile

README: Added more information about what the different files do

builder/mariadb.Dockerfile: Made it get .my.cnf from a file, rather than having it embedded in the Dockerfile.
This is because we need two different my.cnf files at different points in the process.

builder/*my.cnf files: The my.cnf files we need at different points in the process

mariadb-image-builder:

  • Renamed MTK_DUMP_* to MTK_* because the software is no longer called mtk-dump (and both were being used, which wasn't working)
  • Added some more output for the logs
  • Corrected mtk-dump command to work with new version of mtk (which was changed in the last commit, but the script wasn't tested with the new version)

…ust mariadb.Dockerfile

README: Added more information about what the different files do

builder/mariadb.Dockerfile: Made it get .my.cnf from a file, rather than having it embedded in the Dockerfile.
	This is because we need two different my.cnf files at different points in the process.

builder/*my.cnf files: The my.cnf files we need at different points in the process

mariadb-image-builder:

*   Renamed MTK_DUMP_* to MTK_* because the software is no longer called mtk-dump (and both were being used, which wasn't working)
*   Added some more output for the logs
*   Corrected mtk-dump command to work with new version of mtk (which was
    changed in the last commit, but the script wasn't tested with the new
    version)
@tnelson-doghouse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi!

Last time I put in some corrections, we didn't really have a way of testing them on our side (which I should've made clearer at the time). Now we do, and these are the corrections arising from the problems that we found.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant