Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: run_examples warnings to errors #2208

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ethanglaser
Copy link
Contributor

@ethanglaser ethanglaser commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

Our examples should not contain deprecated code usage or yield similar warnings. This PR raises an error if an example has a warning. Fixes include replacing deprecated load_module() in daal4py readcsv, deprecated use of mean_squared_error with squared arg - covers all current warnings aside from Basic Stats.

Pending #2189


PR should start as a draft, then move to ready for review state after CI is passed and all applicable checkboxes are closed.
This approach ensures that reviewers don't spend extra time asking for regular requirements.

You can remove a checkbox as not applicable only if it doesn't relate to this PR in any way.
For example, PR with docs update doesn't require checkboxes for performance while PR with any change in actual code should have checkboxes and justify how this code change is expected to affect performance (or justification should be self-evident).

Checklist to comply with before moving PR from draft:

PR completeness and readability

  • I have reviewed my changes thoroughly before submitting this pull request.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes or created a separate PR with update and provided its number in the description, if necessary.
  • Git commit message contains an appropriate signed-off-by string (see CONTRIBUTING.md for details).
  • I have added a respective label(s) to PR if I have a permission for that.
  • I have resolved any merge conflicts that might occur with the base branch.

Testing

  • I have run it locally and tested the changes extensively.
  • All CI jobs are green or I have provided justification why they aren't.
  • I have extended testing suite if new functionality was introduced in this PR.

@ethanglaser
Copy link
Contributor Author

/intelci: run

@ethanglaser ethanglaser added examples Modify examples testing Tests for sklearnex/daal4py/onedal4py & patching sklearn labels Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
examples Modify examples testing Tests for sklearnex/daal4py/onedal4py & patching sklearn
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant