Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eth secpm splitted #91

Merged
merged 43 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Eth secpm splitted #91

merged 43 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

ramsesfv
Copy link
Contributor

@ramsesfv ramsesfv commented Sep 2, 2024

This branch contains 2 new RFCs:

  1. An RFC describing the secure 1-to-1 communication channels;
  2. An RFC describing the MLS and the decentralized MLS.

@ramsesfv ramsesfv requested review from seemenkina and seugu September 2, 2024 12:26
Copy link
Contributor

@seemenkina seemenkina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just small fix regarding code rendering

vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ramsesfv and others added 11 commits September 3, 2024 14:37
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ekaterina Broslavskaya <[email protected]>
@ramsesfv ramsesfv requested a review from kaiserd September 9, 2024 09:10
Copy link
Contributor

@kaiserd kaiserd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you.

This is the first part of my review. Will do another pass.
See my comments inline.

Main issues are:

  • it seems hard to follow for an uninitiated implementer
    • a theory / protocol flow section before the technical spec would help readers (see RFC template)
  • please make more explicit which parts we added and which parts refer to existing specs (MLS, SIWE)
    • especially in the SIWE part
  • onchain component is under specified, needs more detail
  • should mention centralized parts in SIWE including arguments how we plan to get past that in future versions (for now we can blackbox this)

Also, please fix the linter issues.

vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vac/raw/eth-demls.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ramsesfv ramsesfv merged commit c655980 into main Oct 3, 2024
2 checks passed
@ramsesfv ramsesfv deleted the eth-secpm-splitted branch October 3, 2024 14:20
@ramsesfv ramsesfv restored the eth-secpm-splitted branch October 3, 2024 14:20
@ramsesfv ramsesfv deleted the eth-secpm-splitted branch October 8, 2024 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants