Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSI model #76

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2020
Merged

OSI model #76

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2020

Conversation

vaib-dev
Copy link
Owner

Chapter -3 created 🚀

@vaib-dev vaib-dev added the article Writing chapters in form of small articles label Sep 10, 2020
@vaib-dev vaib-dev self-assigned this Sep 10, 2020
@vaib-dev vaib-dev linked an issue Sep 10, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
16 tasks
Copy link
Collaborator

@udeysingh95 udeysingh95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good work.
I have a small concern - in OSI model section - you have started with Application layer - which is layer number 7 - and in our document its getting number 1 - according to how you started.
Do you think it makes sense to start with the physical layer - so we start from the bottom of the model and then go up and data goes up. Point number will also get automatically corrected then.

@udeysingh95
Copy link
Collaborator

udeysingh95 commented Sep 11, 2020

What are the sources that you used to learn about this.
Which model did you like personally and why?
which one of these do you think is more in use?
Watch this video for further and deeper learning on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Uoku-M6oY

@vaib-dev
Copy link
Owner Author

vaib-dev commented Sep 11, 2020

Do you think it makes sense to start with the physical layer - so we start from the bottom of the model and then go up and data goes up. Point number will also get automatically corrected then.

@udeysingh95, I have we start from the bottom when we are at the receiver side and we start from the top when we are on the sender side. In this, I have discussed the sender side workflow of the model. So we start from the application layer and go down to the physical layer.

@vaib-dev
Copy link
Owner Author

What are the sources that you used to learn about this.

  1. https://medium.com/swlh/understanding-the-osi-model-fa429397324
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv4y_uOneC0

Which model did you like personally and why?

I liked both of the models as they are almost similar in structure, but I would say I enjoyed learning the OSI model. It was very interesting and I was fully focused while learning it. When I started learning the TCP/IP model mostly the language was the same.
But I know that they are very different from each other. At last, I would like to say
The tagline "OSI is a reference model whereas TCP/IP is an implementation model". 😄

which one of these do you think is more in use?

I will go with the OSI model, as it acts as a base of networking, through this model I understood how the data actually travelled from sender to receiver.

Watch this video for further and deeper learning on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Uoku-M6oY

The video was very interesting mainly the way he explained the video. Thanks for the link.

@vaib-dev vaib-dev merged commit c1c7c73 into master Sep 12, 2020
@vaib-dev vaib-dev deleted the cn-osi-model branch September 12, 2020 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
article Writing chapters in form of small articles
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Computer Networks - CCNA
2 participants