-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor and test: update same address multisig implementation #126
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3bc78a9
refactor and test: update same address multisig implementation to che…
kupermind fe4642f
Merge branch 'fuzzing' into same_address_multisig
kupermind eea777e
refactor and test: checking multisig proxy hashes instead of addresses
kupermind b36aca9
Merge branch 'fuzzing' into same_address_multisig
kupermind f151a70
test: correcting forge tests
kupermind File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ describe("GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig", function () { | |
const newThreshold = 3; | ||
const AddressZero = "0x" + "0".repeat(40); | ||
const maxUint256 = "115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639935"; | ||
let bytecodeHash; | ||
|
||
beforeEach(async function () { | ||
const GnosisSafe = await ethers.getContractFactory("GnosisSafe"); | ||
|
@@ -29,8 +30,14 @@ describe("GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig", function () { | |
multiSend = await MultiSend.deploy(); | ||
await multiSend.deployed(); | ||
|
||
const GnosisSafeProxy = await ethers.getContractFactory("GnosisSafeProxy"); | ||
const gnosisSafeProxy = await GnosisSafeProxy.deploy(gnosisSafe.address); | ||
await gnosisSafeProxy.deployed(); | ||
const bytecode = await ethers.provider.getCode(gnosisSafeProxy.address); | ||
bytecodeHash = ethers.utils.keccak256(bytecode); | ||
|
||
const GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig = await ethers.getContractFactory("GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig"); | ||
gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig = await GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.deploy(); | ||
gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig = await GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.deploy([bytecodeHash]); | ||
await gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.deployed(); | ||
|
||
signers = await ethers.getSigners(); | ||
|
@@ -39,6 +46,19 @@ describe("GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig", function () { | |
}); | ||
|
||
context("Verifying multisigs", async function () { | ||
it("Try to deploy a contract without specified proxies or zero hashes", async function () { | ||
const GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig = await ethers.getContractFactory("GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig"); | ||
|
||
await expect( | ||
GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.deploy([]) | ||
).to.be.revertedWithCustomError(gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig, "ZeroValue"); | ||
|
||
const bytes32Zero = "0x" + "0".repeat(64); | ||
await expect( | ||
GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.deploy([bytes32Zero]) | ||
).to.be.revertedWithCustomError(gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig, "ZeroValue"); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we should also update the tests regarding the GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.create() method, no? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There is one in the |
||
it("Should fail when passing the non-zero multisig data with the incorrect number of bytes", async function () { | ||
await expect( | ||
gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.create(newOwnerAddresses, initialThreshold, "0x55") | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need to update the deployment scripts with these hashes