chore: adding mode scripts #196
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
kupermind
commented
Oct 14, 2024
kupermind
commented
- Adding Mode scripts for deployment.
77ph
previously approved these changes
Oct 14, 2024
Comment on lines
+727
to
+734
| "name": "GnosisSafeMultisig", | ||
| "artifact": "abis/0.8.28/GnosisSafeMultisig.json", | ||
| "address": "0x0a50009D55Ed5700ac8FF713709d5Ad5fa843896" | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig", | ||
| "artifact": "abis/0.8.28/GnosisSafeSameAddressMultisig.json", | ||
| "address": "0x77290FF625fc576f465D0256F6a12Ce4480a5b8a" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
where did we take these from?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These are deployed contracts on the mode testnet.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| {"contractVerification":true,"useLedger":true,"derivationPath":"m/44'/60'/2'/0/0","providerName":"base","networkURL":"https://mainnet.mode.network","gasPriceInGwei":"1","gnosisSafeAddress":"0x69f4D1788e39c87893C980c06EdF4b7f686e2938","gnosisSafeProxyFactoryAddress":"0xC22834581EbC8527d974F8a1c97E1bEA4EF910BC","baseURI":"https://gateway.autonolas.tech/ipfs/","serviceRegistryName":"Service Registry L2","serviceRegistrySymbol":"AUTONOLAS-SERVICE-L2-V1","bridgeMediatorAddress":"","olasAddress":"","multisigProxyHash130":"0xb89c1b3bdf2cf8827818646bce9a8f6e372885f8c55e5c07acbd307cb133b000","serviceRegistryAddress":"","operatorWhitelistAddress":"","serviceRegistryTokenUtilityAddress":"","serviceManagerTokenAddress":"","gnosisSafeMultisigImplementationAddress":"","gnosisSafeSameAddressMultisigImplementationAddress":"","stakingTokenAddress":"","stakingNativeTokenAddress":"","minStakingDepositLimit":"10000000000000000000000","timeForEmissionsLimit":"2592000","numServicesLimit":"100","apyLimit":"3000000000000000000","stakingVerifierAddress":"","stakingFactoryAddress":"","L1CrossDomainMessengerProxyAddress":"0x95bDCA6c8EdEB69C98Bd5bd17660BaCef1298A6f"} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
where did we take the gnosis addresses from?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's use the canonical one as historically we use the first Safe in the list of addresses. Technically there is no contract difference, it's the matter of which factory was used to deploy Safe contracts.
DavidMinarsch
previously approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
77ph
previously approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
77ph
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.