chore: code rabbit config #1741
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
2-2: Consider customizing tone instructions.The
tone_instructionsfield is currently empty. Consider adding instructions to ensure consistent and appropriate tone in reviews. For example: "Be constructive, professional, and focus on technical aspects while maintaining a friendly tone."
40-90: Consider performance impact of enabled tools.The configuration enables numerous analysis tools simultaneously (shellcheck, ruff, markdownlint, etc.). While comprehensive, this might significantly impact CI/CD pipeline duration and resource usage.
Consider:
- Enabling only tools relevant to your tech stack
- Running resource-intensive tools only on specific paths or branches
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.coderabbit.yaml
[error] 111-111: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
- GitHub Check: rpc-proxy / test / test
- GitHub Check: rpc-proxy / docker / docker
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (latest)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (latest)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (lts/*)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (lts/*)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (18)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (18)
- GitHub Check: test-apps / Install and test example apps
- GitHub Check: install-build / Build & Lint
- GitHub Check: Execute doc examples
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
48-49: Consider increasing GitHub checks timeout.The current timeout of 90 seconds (90000ms) might be insufficient for larger repositories or complex checks. Consider increasing this value to avoid premature timeouts.
✅ Verification successful
Current GitHub checks timeout is appropriate
The 90-second timeout is sufficient for this repository's size (6.1MB) and complexity (1,237 files). No adjustment is needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check repository size and complexity to determine if 90s timeout is sufficient echo "Repository size:" du -sh . echo -e "\nNumber of files:" find . -type f | wc -lLength of output: 139
Test CoverageSummary
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.coderabbit.yaml (4)
2-2: Consider customizing tone instructions.The
tone_instructionsfield is currently empty. Consider adding specific instructions to ensure consistent and appropriate tone in reviews. For example:tone_instructions: 'Be constructive and encouraging while maintaining technical accuracy. Use a professional yet friendly tone.'
27-28: Consider adding path-specific review rules.The
path_filtersandpath_instructionsarrays are empty. Consider adding path-specific rules to customize review behavior for different parts of your codebase. For example:path_filters: - "src/**/*.ts" - "test/**/*.ts" path_instructions: - path: "src/**/*.ts" instructions: "Ensure strict type checking and proper error handling" - path: "test/**/*.ts" instructions: "Verify test coverage and assertion quality"
40-90: Consider optimizing tool selection.All tools are currently enabled, which might increase review time and generate unnecessary noise. Consider enabling only the tools relevant to your project's tech stack. For example:
- If you don't use PHP, disable
phpstan- If you don't use Swift, disable
swiftlint- If you don't use Ruby, disable
rubocopThis will help focus reviews on relevant checks and improve performance.
106-106: Consider configuring integration keys.The Jira project keys and Linear team keys arrays are empty. To fully utilize these integrations, consider adding your project-specific keys:
jira: project_keys: ["PROJ", "TEAM"] linear: team_keys: ["TEAM1", "TEAM2"]Also applies to: 109-109
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
- GitHub Check: rpc-proxy / test / test
- GitHub Check: rpc-proxy / docker / docker
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (latest)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (latest)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (lts/*)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (lts/*)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test-browser / Build & Lint (18)
- GitHub Check: unit-integration-test / Build & Lint (18)
- GitHub Check: test-apps / Install and test example apps
- GitHub Check: install-build / Build & Lint
- GitHub Check: Execute doc examples
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.coderabbit.yaml (3)
30-36: Auto review configuration looks good!The auto review settings are well configured with proper base branch patterns.
91-97: Chat configuration looks good!The chat settings are appropriately configured with auto-reply and integration defaults.
111-111: Add newline at end of file.Add a newline character at the end of the file to follow YAML best practices and fix the yamllint error.
Description
Config file for code rabbit ai
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
Test Configuration:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit