-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(releasing): Prepare v0.36.1 #20039
Conversation
/ci-run-all |
* Use http client so we can use openssl tls. * Share connector code. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> * Clippy Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> * Feedback from Bruce. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]>
* Use http client so we can use openssl tls. * Share connector code. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> * Clippy Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> * Feedback from Bruce. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> * Resolve region with custom http provider. Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Stephen Wakely <[email protected]>
We think this will fix #19627. Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
* chore(deps): Bump whoami to 1.5.0 Resolves RUSTSEC-2024-0020 Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]> * regenerate licenses Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
) Otherwise it outputs this warning: ``` 2024-03-07T11:59:25.573521Z WARN provide_credentials{provider=default_chain}: aws_config::meta::credentials::chain: provider failed to provide credentials provider=Profile error=the credentials provider was not properly configured: ProfileFile provider could not be built: This behavior requires following cargo feature(s) enabled: credentials-process. In order to spawn a subprocess, the credentials-process feature must be enabled. (InvalidConfiguration(InvalidConfiguration { source: "ProfileFile provider could not be built: This behavior requires following cargo feature(s) enabled: credentials-process. In order to spawn a subprocess, the credentials-process feature must be enabled." ``` Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
* fix(compression): Fix gzip and zlib performance degradation Fix gzip and zlib performance degradation caused by: * flate2 v1.0.28 started to resize its input buffer up to its capacity and back to the actual number of bytes written. * Some sinks are writing to Compressor without buffering, resulting in frequent small writes to the flate2 writer. Within 32KB of input buffer in flate2, this causes an excessive number of memset operations and degraded sink throughput. This fix introduces a wrapper buffer in front of gzip and zlib writers to accumulate data before calling the write function of the underlying writer. Signed-off-by: Artur Malchanau <[email protected]> * Add a link to the comment with more context. --------- Signed-off-by: Artur Malchanau <[email protected]>
Resolves RUSTSEC-2024-0019 Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
83e3625
to
622906e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good for docs
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 2333 Passed, 0 Skipped, 30m 9.52s Wall Time |
Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 204df271-7643-4217-8369-56b79ac4b942 Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | +3.11 | [+2.99, +3.23] |
➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | +2.81 | [+2.75, +2.86] |
➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | +2.70 | [+2.62, +2.77] |
➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | +2.58 | [+2.45, +2.72] |
➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | +1.37 | [+1.32, +1.43] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | +1.26 | [+1.16, +1.37] |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | +0.68 | [+0.52, +0.83] |
➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | +0.66 | [+0.17, +1.15] |
➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | +0.41 | [+0.31, +0.52] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.20 | [+0.11, +0.29] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +0.19 | [+0.11, +0.27] |
➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.14 | [+0.00, +0.28] |
➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | +0.13 | [+0.03, +0.22] |
➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.01, +0.15] |
➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | +0.05 | [-1.27, +1.37] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.08, +0.12] |
➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.14, +0.14] |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.16, +0.15] |
➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.30, +0.27] |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.14, +0.09] |
➖ | enterprise_http_to_http | ingress throughput | -0.12 | [-0.18, -0.05] |
➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.30 | [-0.39, -0.22] |
➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -0.50 | [-0.56, -0.43] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | -1.43 | [-3.84, +0.98] |
➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -1.44 | [-1.60, -1.29] |
➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -2.17 | [-2.63, -1.71] |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | -2.21 | [-2.32, -2.11] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
622906e
to
2857180
Compare
/ci-run-all |
Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 9548e3dc-0032-4bae-8624-f0dcf80f146c Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | +3.04 | [+2.94, +3.14] |
➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | +2.76 | [+2.70, +2.82] |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +2.51 | [+0.03, +4.99] |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | +2.47 | [+2.32, +2.61] |
➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.82 | [+1.74, +1.89] |
➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +1.60 | [+1.47, +1.73] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +1.16 | [+1.08, +1.24] |
➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | +0.94 | [+0.44, +1.44] |
➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | +0.82 | [+0.76, +0.88] |
➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | +0.82 | [-0.49, +2.14] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | +0.62 | [+0.53, +0.72] |
➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.31 | [+0.15, +0.47] |
➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | +0.17 | [+0.08, +0.27] |
➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | +0.08 | [-0.20, +0.36] |
➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.06, +0.09] |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.16, +0.16] |
➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.15, +0.14] |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.12, +0.10] |
➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.12, +0.02] |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | -0.11 | [-0.26, +0.03] |
➖ | enterprise_http_to_http | ingress throughput | -0.15 | [-0.24, -0.06] |
➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.28 | [-0.37, -0.20] |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | -0.61 | [-0.73, -0.50] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.77 | [-0.86, -0.68] |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | -1.04 | [-1.14, -0.93] |
➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -1.05 | [-1.51, -0.59] |
➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | -1.57 | [-1.65, -1.48] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Merged locally to preserve commit history. |
Checklist: #20038