Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): Fix finding of merge-base for regression workflow #21186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

jszwedko
Copy link
Member

Clone whole repository. Also use origin/master since a local branch may not be created.

Clone whole repository. Also use `origin/master` since a local branch may not be created.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
@jszwedko jszwedko added the no-changelog Changes in this PR do not need user-facing explanations in the release changelog label Aug 29, 2024
@jszwedko jszwedko requested a review from a team as a code owner August 29, 2024 21:41
@jszwedko jszwedko added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 29, 2024
@datadog-vectordotdev
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: jszwedko/regression-workflow-fetch-depth
Commit report: 2c178e7
Test service: vector

✅ 0 Failed, 7 Passed, 0 Skipped, 25.5s Total Time

Merged via the queue into master with commit ebc5337 Aug 29, 2024
70 checks passed
@jszwedko jszwedko deleted the jszwedko/regression-workflow-fetch-depth branch August 29, 2024 23:19
AndrooTheChen pushed a commit to discord/vector that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2024
…otdev#21186)

Clone whole repository. Also use `origin/master` since a local branch may not be created.

Signed-off-by: Jesse Szwedko <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-changelog Changes in this PR do not need user-facing explanations in the release changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants