Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency ruff to v0.5.4 #13

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 21, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ruff (source, changelog) 0.5.2 -> 0.5.4 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

astral-sh/ruff (ruff)

v0.5.4

Compare Source

Rule changes
  • [ruff] Rename RUF007 to zip-instead-of-pairwise (#​12399)
Bug fixes
  • [flake8-builtins] Avoid shadowing diagnostics for @override methods (#​12415)
  • [flake8-comprehensions] Insert parentheses for multi-argument generators (#​12422)
  • [pydocstyle] Handle escaped docstrings within docstring (D301) (#​12192)
Documentation
  • Fix GitHub link to Neovim setup (#​12410)
  • Fix output-format default in settings reference (#​12409)

v0.5.3

Compare Source

Ruff 0.5.3 marks the stable release of the Ruff language server and introduces revamped
documentation, including setup guides for your editor of
choice
and the language server
itself
.

Preview features
  • Formatter: Insert empty line between suite and alternative branch after function/class definition (#​12294)
  • [pyupgrade] Implement unnecessary-default-type-args (UP043) (#​12371)
Rule changes
  • [flake8-bugbear] Detect enumerate iterations in loop-iterator-mutation (B909) (#​12366)
  • [flake8-bugbear] Remove discard, remove, and pop allowance for loop-iterator-mutation (B909) (#​12365)
  • [pylint] Allow repeated-equality-comparison for mixed operations (PLR1714) (#​12369)
  • [pylint] Ignore self and cls when counting arguments (PLR0913) (#​12367)
  • [pylint] Use UTF-8 as default encoding in unspecified-encoding fix (PLW1514) (#​12370)
Server
  • Build settings index in parallel for the native server (#​12299)
  • Use fallback settings when indexing the project (#​12362)
  • Consider --preview flag for server subcommand for the linter and formatter (#​12208)
Bug fixes
  • [flake8-comprehensions] Allow additional arguments for sum and max comprehensions (C419) (#​12364)
  • [pylint] Avoid dropping extra boolean operations in repeated-equality-comparison (PLR1714) (#​12368)
  • [pylint] Consider expression before statement when determining binding kind (PLR1704) (#​12346)
Documentation
  • Add docs for Ruff language server (#​12344)
  • Migrate to standalone docs repo (#​12341)
  • Update versioning policy for editor integration (#​12375)
Other changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Jul 21, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for ead7ba01
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (ead7ba0) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (4eefcb0) 43 43 100.00%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#13) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences


🚀 Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.67%. Comparing base (d7648e5) to head (4eefcb0).
Report is 21 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #13   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.67%   97.67%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines          43       43           
  Branches        6        6           
=======================================
  Hits           42       42           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ruff-0.x branch from 3644f6e to 410effc Compare July 21, 2024 20:59
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 22, 2024

@vil02 vil02 merged commit 88992cb into master Jul 22, 2024
9 checks passed
@vil02 vil02 deleted the renovate/ruff-0.x branch July 22, 2024 07:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants