Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

npm publish #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

vbinithyanandamv
Copy link

@vbinithyanandamv vbinithyanandamv commented Nov 8, 2023

PR Type:

Refactoring


PR Description:

This PR includes two main changes:

  • Update the Browserslist configuration to include browsers that fully support ES6 modules and maintained Node versions.
  • Refactor the CircleCI configuration by removing the step that halts the build if the commit message does not contain 'publish'. Also, the step to update the NPM auth token is retained.

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:
  • .browserslistrc: The Browserslist configuration has been updated to target browsers that fully support ES6 modules and maintained Node versions. The 'not dead' query has been removed.
  • .circleci/config.yml: The CircleCI configuration has been refactored. The step that halts the build if the commit message does not contain 'publish' has been removed. The step to update the NPM auth token is retained.

User Description:

Summary

Test plan

Related to source code (for typings update)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring the Browserslist and CircleCI configurations
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR updates the Browserslist configuration to target browsers that fully support ES6 modules and maintained Node versions. It also refactors the CircleCI configuration by removing the step that halts the build if the commit message does not contain 'publish', while retaining the step to update the NPM auth token.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR is relatively small and straightforward, focusing on configuration changes rather than code logic.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and the changes are clearly explained. However, it would be helpful to include a rationale for these changes. For instance, why was the decision made to remove the 'not dead' query from the Browserslist configuration? Similarly, why was the step to halt the build removed from the CircleCI configuration?

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: .browserslistrc
      suggestion: Consider adding a comment explaining the new configuration, as it might not be immediately clear to all developers. [medium]
      relevant line: >0.25%, defaults, fully supports es6-module, maintained node versions

    • relevant file: .circleci/config.yml
      suggestion: It might be useful to add a comment explaining why the 'Avoid CI build' step was removed, to provide context for future developers. [medium]
      relevant line: - run:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@nsdevaraj nsdevaraj merged commit c8a5862 into visualbis:exceljs-lite Nov 8, 2023
1 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants