[pull] master from exceljs:master

[pull]

See Commits and Changes for more details.

---

Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Description updated to latest commit (5bed18b)

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Bug fix and enhancement of table styling in ExcelJS
• 📝 PR summary: This PR addresses a bug in the 'assignStyle' function in 'lib/doc/table.js' where styles were not being correctly assigned to the cell's style property. It also enhances the 'TableColumnProperties' interface in 'index.d.ts' by adding a 'style' property, allowing for styles to be applied to the column. The test file 'test/test-table.js' has also been updated accordingly.
• 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and well-explained in the PR description.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are clearly explained. The bug fix and enhancement are relevant and useful. It would be beneficial to add more context or examples in the PR description about how the bug was affecting the functionality and how the enhancement improves the user experience.

🤖 Code feedback:

---

relevant file	lib/doc/table.js
suggestion	Consider using a more descriptive function name than assignStyle. Something like assignStyleToCell would make the function's purpose clearer. [medium]
relevant line	const assignStyle = (cell, style) => {

---

relevant file	test/test-table.js
suggestion	It's good practice to separate the logic for generating test data from the test itself. Consider moving the logic for generating 'rows' to a separate function. [medium]
relevant line	rows: words.map((word, i) => {

---

relevant file	index.d.ts
suggestion	It would be helpful to add more details in the comment for the 'style' property, explaining what styles can be applied and how they affect the column. [medium]
relevant line	style?: Partial<Style>;

---

---

✨ Usage guide:

---

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the code feedback section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is: pr_commands = ["/review", ...] meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions. If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results. Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag) a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)

Extra sub-tools The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.