Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[torch.compile] More rigorous test for piecewise CUDA graphs #10019

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator

The current test for piecewise CUDA graphs is not rigorous enough since it initializes the weights and inputs all zeros. This PR randomly initializes those so that it can actually test whether the piecewise CUDA graphs are functionally working.

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon requested a review from youkaichao November 5, 2024 03:23
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can do one of these:

  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon changed the title [torch.compile] Make test more rigorous for piecewise CUDA graphs [torch.compile] More rigorous test for piecewise CUDA graphs Nov 5, 2024
@WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fixed by #10048

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon closed this Nov 5, 2024
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon deleted the piecewise-test branch November 5, 2024 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant