-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ Misc ] fbgemm
checkpoints
#6559
Conversation
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. Once the PR is approved and ready to go, please make sure to run full CI as it is required to merge (or just use auto-merge). To run full CI, you can do one of these:
🚀 |
/ready |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work keeping it clean, LGTM
x: torch.Tensor, | ||
bias: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None) -> torch.Tensor: | ||
|
||
return apply_fp8_linear(input=x, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that apply_fp8_linear would work here. Using fbgemm it would look like:
xq, x_scale = torch.ops.fbgemm.quantize_fp8_per_row(
x, num_tokens, self.activation_scale_ub
)
y = torch.ops.fbgemm.f8f8bf16_rowwise(
xq, layer.weight, x_scale, layer.weight_scale, use_fast_accum=True
)
Particularly input_scale=None is most likely wrong, here is a reference implementation for quantize_fp8_per_row
def fp8_row_quantize_ref(x: torch.Tensor) -> Tuple[torch.Tensor, torch.Tensor]:
# Quantize an input tensor and return the fp8 tensor and its inverse scale.
x_row_max = torch.max(torch.abs(x), dim=1).values
max_scaling_factor = E4M3_MAX_POS * 512.0 # Match kernel logics
scale = torch.Tensor(E4M3_MAX_POS / x_row_max).clamp(max=max_scaling_factor)
xq = (x * scale.unsqueeze(1)).to(fp8_e4m3)
return xq, scale.reciprocal().to(torch.float32)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup, we are updating the quant kernel right now to use the activation_scale_ub
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in combo with https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/6547/files
which enables per token scales
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Besides both torch._scaled_mm and ops.scaled_fp8_quant expect scale to be scalar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#6547 extends ops.scaled_fp8_quant
to accepts per token scales (vector of scales)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
torch._scaled_mm
will not be used.
cutlass_scaled_mm
accepts per channel weights and per token activations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pulled in #6547 to this PR so you can see
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adds #6593 adds the ub
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, this PR currently now has the
scale_ub
- uses dynamic per token activation scales
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
.buildkite/lm-eval-harness/configs/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct-Channelwise-compressed-tensors.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Alvant <[email protected]>
SUMMARY:
fbgemm
checkpoints from https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/pull/32047/files using our existing cutlass kernelsactivation_scale_ub
from the state dict and instead uses the config.jsonBEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!