-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor to simplify code #53
Open
ghoneycutt
wants to merge
1
commit into
voxpupuli:master
Choose a base branch
from
ghoneycutt:refactor
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+172
−210
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given its size, wouldn't it be clearer to use heredoc and inline it in the example?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is pretty much useless, because we already have it at
manifests/vhosts.pp
andREFERENCE.md
for what it is worth.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One pattern I've been using is to read examples in acceptance tests: https://github.com/theforeman/puppet-foreman_proxy/blob/d2f07f4a7e460231015f91469f298eb6831c7479/spec/spec_helper_acceptance.rb#L33-L40
It's on my agenda to add that example to voxpupuli-acceptance. The benefit is that you have syntax highlighting and linting for your code samples and you can browse the things we test.
So for now I wouldn't just get rid of it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ekohl we do the same thing for sensu-puppet
https://github.com/sensu/sensu-puppet/blob/master/spec/spec_helper_acceptance.rb#L46
https://github.com/sensu/sensu-puppet/blob/master/spec/acceptance/examples_spec.rb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer the HEREDOC approach if only to get rid of the example data from the module under
files/
. Really that should only include what is actually used by the module. Given it is namedexamples
though, it does seem very clear what is happening. I'll let @dhoppe flip a coin and decide to change it or not in a later PR :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Glad to hear I'm not alone in this. Given the code is very different, this clearly evolved separate which tells me there's a good chance it's a good idea :)
That was indeed my reason for it.