Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add implementation for headless scenario #44

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mateolis03
Copy link

@mateolis03 mateolis03 commented Dec 4, 2023

What problem is this solving?

These changes add support for headless implementations, it add new optional fields on the schema to avoid the use of the store-front permissions in a mandatory way, those fields mock the ones fetched originally from the store-front permissions, and also new validations are set in to identify when the requests are sent from a native environment or a headless one.

How to test it?

Workspace

Screenshots or example usage:

image

How does this PR make you feel? 🔗

Cat

Copy link

vtex-io-ci-cd bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi! I'm VTEX IO CI/CD Bot and I'll be helping you to publish your app! 🤖

Please select which version do you want to release:

  • Patch (backwards-compatible bug fixes)

  • Minor (backwards-compatible functionality)

  • Major (incompatible API changes)

And then you just need to merge your PR when you are ready! There is no need to create a release commit/tag.

  • No thanks, I would rather do it manually 😞

@mateolis03 mateolis03 changed the title Add implementation for headless scenario feat: Add implementation for headless scenario Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants