Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(nuxt): Support nuxt layers in a better way #2699

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: v2
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

marr
Copy link

@marr marr commented Jun 20, 2024

When using the pinia nuxt module with nuxt layers, there were some things that don't appear to work correctly.

I am trying to solve for a nuxt layer workflow, which adds the pinia module and registers some stores in the base layer. I want those stores to be available to my containing app, as well as stores that the containing app defines.

The issues I found with the current state of the module include:

  1. The pinia module tries to resolve pinia/dist/pinia.mjs from the containing app. This is problematic, because the layer is the one bringing the pinia dependency in. It should be using the distributable that the layer depends on.
  2. The stores directory in the layer gets lost when the containing app tries to register its own stores.
  3. Extending the layer should bring in the stores from the layer, and allow adding stores from the containing app.

I believe this PR solves those three problems. We remove some use of a deprecated API as well.

To add tests to this, I think I'd need to create a new "playground-layer" directory and extend from that in a new nuxt spec pertaining to layer functionality. If you agree with these changes, we can discuss if you'd like that as part of this.

Note: This may break nuxt 2 compatibility. I can try to add back support if this is a decent enough approach to fixing layer support.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for pinia-playground ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e5a9139
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pinia-playground/deploys/67488a433ba2750008304d49
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2699--pinia-playground.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for pinia-official canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e5a9139
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pinia-official/deploys/67488a43e51d8e00083717b7

@marr marr force-pushed the v2 branch 2 times, most recently from 6d67cf0 to f4ec13b Compare June 24, 2024 12:22
Copy link
Member

@posva posva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR!
Adding the test would be a nice next step.
Regarding Nuxt 2, it should still work with nuxt bridge

for (const storeDir of [
...options.storesDirs,
/* @ts-expect-error storesDirs isn't on base NuxtOptions type */
...(nuxt.options.pinia?.storesDirs || []),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't seem necessary

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this was added so that apps that extend layers using this module can still provide storesDirs that would be auto-imported. For example, if myapp had stores in a mystores directory, it could add those, while still importing stores the layer defines in its own context.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the layer adds options, I suppose they should appear in the options object. If not, it might be an intentional design for layers in Nuxt. Or are you referring to something else?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, thank you for correcting. I added tests and used explicit storesDirs in the layer config now to ensure that its stores get added.

@marr marr force-pushed the v2 branch 2 times, most recently from 6b176e0 to 206c1b8 Compare July 29, 2024 16:22
@marr
Copy link
Author

marr commented Oct 23, 2024

@posva is this still something you might consider?

@posva
Copy link
Member

posva commented Oct 23, 2024

Yes! I will check it in my next pass

@marr
Copy link
Author

marr commented Oct 23, 2024

Thank you! If you are trying to reproduce the error you can follow these steps. Its also reproducible using a layer but you can also do it using a module like so:

npx nuxi create my-module -t module
// tweak package.json to add overrides: { vue: “latest” } — super annoying!!
npm install pinia @pinia/nuxt
// edit src/module.ts and simply `installModule(‘@pinia/nuxt’)` within the setup function
npm pack

// now to reproduce the error you can create a new nuxt project
npx nuxi init my-app
cd my-app
npm install ../my-module/my-module-1.0.0.tgz
// add `my-module` to the `modules` array in your app's nuxt.config.ts file.
npx nuxi prepare

 — see error below:

$ npx nuxi prepare

 ERROR  [unhandledRejection] Cannot find module 'pinia/dist/pinia.mjs'                                                                                                    1:52:52 PM
Require stack:
- /Path/to/my/index.js

  Require stack:
  - index.js
  at Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1248:15)
  at Function.resolve (node:internal/modules/helpers:145:19)
  at Function._resolve [as resolve] (node_modules/jiti/dist/jiti.js:1:241814)
  at resolveModule (node_modules/@nuxt/kit/dist/index.mjs:2234:29)
  at setup (node_modules/@pinia/nuxt/dist/module.mjs:23:5)
  at normalizedModule (node_modules/@nuxt/kit/dist/index.mjs:2136:37)
  at async installModule (node_modules/@nuxt/kit/dist/index.mjs:2478:95)

✔ Types generated in .nuxt

Also note that this doesn't seem to happen using pnpm, so make sure to use npm for the reproduction.

@posva
Copy link
Member

posva commented Nov 28, 2024

The line that was problematic for layers has been removed. Could you confirm there is no need for something now?

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@pinia/nuxt@2699
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/pinia@2699
npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@pinia/testing@2699

commit: e5a9139

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🧑‍💻 In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants