UN/CEFACT production term update #726
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
better now than later - really appreciate the updates on this |
BenjaminMoe
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2023
OR13
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As announced a while back the UN/CEFACT vocab has been promoted from previous draft state to production. The project is not yet formally closed, but development efforts are considered to be completed.
https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/
The main difference from the draft UN vocab is a much nicer DNS and path. But there are also some NDR updates, so a dirty search-replace wasn't enough, I made sure each URI resolves and makes business sense.
This will obviously cause breaking proofs across the board, changing the terms behind our context. There is never a good time to do this kind of thing.