-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/ams form additions #784
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
only blocking feedback is the invalid IRI.
I'm closing this for now, to be re-opened when I've finished the refactor suggested on last week's call. |
I've refactored ExtendedProduct into AgProduct and Product, which should be a lot cleaner. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tweaks
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ | |||
$linkedData: | |||
term: ExtendedProduct |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems like a slighty off pattern here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest adding this to AgricultureProduct instead
@@ -76,7 +69,51 @@ properties: | |||
type: string | |||
$linkedData: | |||
term: labelImageHash | |||
'@id': https://schema.org/sha256 | |||
'@id': https://w3id.org/traceability#labelImageHash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
too bad we don't have a better term def for this
Add additional fields & schemas to improve
USDASpecialtyCrops237AForm
, in response to stakeholder feedback.