Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disambiguate "running" for transactions #409

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023
Merged

Disambiguate "running" for transactions #409

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 3, 2023

Conversation

inexorabletash
Copy link
Member

@inexorabletash inexorabletash commented Jul 28, 2023

The phrase "a transaction is running" was not normatively defined and confusing given the complex lifecycle of transactions. Introduce a new definition for "live" which covers from a transactions creation until it is finished.

Also, rename "running an upgrade transaction" since steps are often invoked with "run" and that could get awkward. Simplify to "upgrade a database".

No behavior changes, just normative terminology definitions.

Resolves #408. Thanks to @evanstade the issue and suggestions.

The following tasks have been completed:

  • Confirmed there are no ReSpec/BikeShed errors or warnings.

Preview | Diff

The phrase "a transaction is running" was not normatively defined and
confusing given the complex lifecycle of transactions. Introduce a new
definition for "live" which covers from a transactions creation until
it is finished.

Also, rename "running an upgrade transaction" since steps are often
invoked with "run" and that could get awkward. Simplify to "upgrade a
database".

No behavior changes, just normative terminology definitions.

Resolves #408. Thanks to @evanstade the issue and suggestions.
@inexorabletash
Copy link
Member Author

@evanstade could you take a look?

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@a-sully a-sully left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM % optional nits

index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Austin Sullivan <[email protected]>
@inexorabletash inexorabletash merged commit 43dfcf1 into main Aug 3, 2023
1 check passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2023
SHA: 43dfcf1
Reason: push, by inexorabletash

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@inexorabletash inexorabletash deleted the running branch December 11, 2023 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Transaction lifetime verbiage, "running"
3 participants