-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
GH-587: shnex:nodesWhere node expression #611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: gh-pages
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
May I get some feedback on this PR please? |
See comments on the issue about naming. "nodesWhere" does not lead to a natural syntax in the rule language. "match", as originally propsoed, does. |
shacl12-vocabularies/shnex.ttl
Outdated
| . | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # Nodes Where Expressions ----------------------------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If every Nodes Where is case-sentively replaced with Nodes Matching, I think @afs will be satisfied, and general comprehension improved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@afs would shnex:nodesMatching work for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
Closes #587
The PR is large because it includes some fixes to the layout of various examples (tabs vs spaces, aligned use of blocks).