update secp256k1-2019
w3id.org URLs to be versioned and consistent
#525
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm not sure if a small PR like this is a helpful way to contribute; I hope so! Don't think this gets anywhere near a "substantive contributions to specifications" but can do paperwork if needed.
The primary motivation here is that URL https://w3id.org/security/suites/secp256k1-2019 is valid, but does not point to an actual JSON-LD document, just a landing page which links to the v1 document. Most of the other URLs in the registry document point directly to the JSON-LD document.
For the
secp256k1recovery-2020
URL, the href already has/v1
, but the display URL does not. Seems like they should be consistent like the other URLs.The background context which led me here was the https://didlint.ownyourdata.eu/validate tool wanting
@context
URLs to match what is in the spec registry document (which forsecp256k1-2019
means no trailing/v1
), while the@context
should point directly to a JSON-LD doc, resulting in a contradiction.Hypothetically it might be most correct to list multiple URLs in the "JSON-LD" columns in this document, both versioned and not.
Preview | Diff