Create btc.json

[sangaman]

DID Method Registration

As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:

• The DID Method specification defines the DID Method Syntax.
• The DID Method specification defines the Create, Read, Update, and Deactivate DID Method Operations.
• The DID Method specification contains a Security Considerations section.
• The DID Method specification contains a Privacy Considerations section.
• The JSON file I am submitting has passed all automated validation tests below.
• The JSON file contains a contactEmail address [OPTIONAL].
• The JSON file contains a verifiableDataRegistry entry [OPTIONAL].

[gatemezing]

@sangaman could you check with there are some issues with your PR?

[msporny]

Meets minimum requirements for registration.

[msporny]

Re-ping for review of did:btc -- @apuchitnis, @stenreijers, @gatemezing, @adam-burns, @Steffytan, @MizukiSonoko, @rajivrajani, @genaris, @ajile-in and @KDean-Dolphin

[msporny]

2nd re-ping for review of did:btc -- @apuchitnis @stenreijers @gatemezing @esaung @michallis @richardwinputra @adam-burns @Steffytan @MizukiSonoko @rajivrajani @genaris @harleyjackthomas @ajile-in @KDean-Dolphin

[sangaman]

Hello, I'm afraid this method might be effectively abandoned at the moment. I would be happy to address the reviews to get this merged if we want it for posterity's sake - however as far as I know there are not any plans to keep working on this method or build applications for this method in the foreseeable future.

[gatemezing]

Hello, I'm afraid this method might be effectively abandoned at the moment. I would be happy to address the reviews to get this merged if we want it for posterity's sake - however as far as I know there are not any plans to keep working on this method or build applications for this method in the foreseeable future.

So, you'll change the status in the file? or how do you see we move forward?

[msporny]

Hello, I'm afraid this method might be effectively abandoned at the moment. I would be happy to address the reviews to get this merged if we want it for posterity's sake - however as far as I know there are not any plans to keep working on this method or build applications for this method in the foreseeable future.

I'll close the PR, then. No need to eat up space in the registry for something where the registrant has stated that there will be no future work on this method.