Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Remove issue marker requiring interop report; no feedback on topic.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
msporny committed Aug 25, 2024
1 parent 66862bb commit cabe9f3
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 19 deletions.
27 changes: 8 additions & 19 deletions index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1636,14 +1636,14 @@ <h2>Relationship to Verifiable Credentials</h2>
<section>
<h2>Cryptographic Suites</h2>
<p>
A data integrity proof is designed to be easy to use by developers and therefore
strives to minimize the amount of information one has to remember to generate a
proof. Often, just the [=cryptographic suite=] name (e.g.
`eddsa-rdfc-2022`) is required from developers to initiate the creation of
a proof. These [=cryptographic suite=]s are often created or reviewed by
people that have the requisite cryptographic training to ensure that safe
combinations of cryptographic primitives are used. This section specifies the
requirements for authoring cryptographic suite specifications.
A [=data integrity proof=] is designed to be easy to use by developers and
therefore strives to minimize the amount of information one has to remember to
generate a proof. Often, just the [=cryptographic suite=] name (such as
`eddsa-rdfc-2022`) is required from developers to initiate the creation of a
proof. These [=cryptographic suite=]s are often created and reviewed by people
that have the requisite cryptographic training to ensure that safe combinations
of cryptographic primitives are used. This section specifies the requirements
for authoring cryptographic suite specifications.
</p>

<p>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1746,17 +1746,6 @@ <h2>Cryptographic Suites</h2>
[=cryptosuite instantiation algorithms=].
</p>

<p class="issue" title="Require interoperability report?">
The following language was deemed to be contentious: <em>The specification MUST
provide a link to an interoperability test report to document which
implementations are conformant with the cryptographic suite specification.</em>
<br>
<br>
The Working Group is seeking feedback on whether or not this is desired given
the important role that cryptographic suite specifications play in ensuring
data integrity.
</p>

<section>
<h3>DataIntegrityProof</h3>

Expand Down

0 comments on commit cabe9f3

Please sign in to comment.