Skip to content

Benchmarking Blockchain Data Availability: Polkadot ELVES vs Modular DA Layers #2578

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

prasad-kumkar
Copy link

Project Abstract

We propose a comprehensive research study comparing the data availability (DA) mechanisms of Polkadot’s integrated availability protocol (used in ELVES) with those of leading blockchain DA schemes like Celestia, Avail, Espresso's Tiramisu, and NEAR. Our goal is to evaluate and benchmark these systems on key performance, security, and efficiency metrics, such as bandwidth usage, latency, light-client trust assumptions, and validator resource overhead. We will use real network telemetry from Polkadot/Kusama, Celestia mainnet, Avail testnet, and other platforms, along with protocol analysis and reproducible experiments, to generate a detailed and objective comparison.

The research will deliver a deeply technical report, open-source benchmarking tools, and curated datasets, all licensed openly under Apache-2.0 and CC BY 4.0. The findings will inform protocol developers, parachain teams, and researchers about the strengths and trade-offs of each approach, and highlight Polkadot's positioning in a growing ecosystem of modular and scalable blockchain architectures. We also propose optional dissemination via an interactive dashboard, tutorial videos, and blog posts to maximize the accessibility and long-term value of the research.

This proposal is in response to the Research Task shared by W3F.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (USDC & DOT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @prasad-kumkar:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 20, 2025

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Jun 20, 2025
@prasad-kumkar
Copy link
Author

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant