Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified #102

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

danielpanzella
Copy link
Contributor

@danielpanzella danielpanzella commented Sep 26, 2024

  • We no longer default to AZ 1 and 2 in the region
  • User can specify desired zones as before
  • If the user does not specify zones we will select the first two zones that support the node type being used

BREAKING CHANGE: Requires a new provider (azapi) to be made available

@danielpanzella danielpanzella changed the title Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified feat: Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified Sep 26, 2024
@danielpanzella danielpanzella changed the title feat: Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified feat!: Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified Sep 27, 2024
@danielpanzella danielpanzella merged commit 8a17acc into main Sep 27, 2024
6 checks passed
@danielpanzella danielpanzella deleted the danielpanzella/autoselect-azs-for-nodetype branch September 27, 2024 18:48
jsbroks pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
## [3.0.0](v2.15.1...v3.0.0) (2024-09-27)

### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified (#102)

### Features

* Automatically select availability zones based on node type when not specified ([#102](#102)) ([8a17acc](8a17acc))
@jsbroks
Copy link
Member

jsbroks commented Sep 27, 2024

This PR is included in version 3.0.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants