-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
code refator #80
code refator #80
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes reflect a comprehensive effort to enhance error handling, ensure code consistency, and introduce functional improvements across various components and setup files in the application. Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional Context UsedGitHub Check Runs (1)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Coverage reportTotal coverage
Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 46ca722 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ describe('<SimpsonsLoveWednesday />', () => { | |||
}; | |||
const { getByText } = renderWithIntl(<SimpsonsLoveWednesday {...props} />); | |||
expect(getByText(props.userErrorMessage)).toBeTruthy(); | |||
props.userErrorMessage = null; | |||
set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using direct assignment instead of lodash/set
for modifying props.userErrorMessage
in tests for clarity and maintainability.
- set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null);
+ props.userErrorMessage = null;
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null); | |
props.userErrorMessage = null; |
const formattedMessageOptions = { | ||
true: get(defaultFormattedMessages, key), | ||
false: get(messages, key) | ||
}; | ||
const formattedCondition = !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE; | ||
return { | ||
...formattedMessages, | ||
[key]: get(formattedMessageOptions, formattedCondition) | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider simplifying the logic in formatTranslationMessages
to enhance readability. Using a ternary operator directly might be more straightforward than using a condition object.
- const formattedMessageOptions = {
- true: get(defaultFormattedMessages, key),
- false: get(messages, key)
- };
- const formattedCondition = !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE;
- return {
- ...formattedMessages,
- [key]: get(formattedMessageOptions, formattedCondition)
- };
+ return {
+ ...formattedMessages,
+ [key]: !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE ? get(defaultFormattedMessages, key) : get(messages, key)
+ };
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
const formattedMessageOptions = { | |
true: get(defaultFormattedMessages, key), | |
false: get(messages, key) | |
}; | |
const formattedCondition = !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE; | |
return { | |
...formattedMessages, | |
[key]: get(formattedMessageOptions, formattedCondition) | |
}; | |
return { | |
...formattedMessages, | |
[key]: !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE ? get(defaultFormattedMessages, key) : get(messages, key) | |
}; |
app/utils/apiUtils.js
Outdated
const apiClientOption = { | ||
configApi: () => { | ||
set(apiClients, type, createApiClientWithTransForm(Config.API_URL)); | ||
return get(apiClients, type); | ||
}, | ||
default: () => { | ||
set(apiClients, 'default', createApiClientWithTransForm(Config.API_URL)); | ||
return apiClients.default; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}; | ||
const clientGenerator = get(apiClientOption, type, apiClientOption.default); | ||
return clientGenerator(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure the new logic in generateApiClient
is covered by tests, especially since it involves dynamic property access which can be prone to errors if not handled correctly.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ describe('<SimpsonsLoveWednesday />', () => { | |||
}; | |||
const { getByText } = renderWithIntl(<SimpsonsLoveWednesday {...props} />); | |||
expect(getByText(props.userErrorMessage)).toBeTruthy(); | |||
props.userErrorMessage = null; | |||
set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we set here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
set( | ||
response, | ||
'data', | ||
mapKeysDeep(data, keys => camelCase(keys)) | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The transformation logic in createApiClientWithTransForm
uses set
and mapKeysDeep
effectively for handling API response data. However, ensure this part of the code is covered by tests to prevent potential issues with data handling.
Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this transformation logic?
set( | ||
request, | ||
'data', | ||
mapKeysDeep(data, keys => snakeCase(keys)) | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similarly, the request transformation logic is well implemented using set
and mapKeysDeep
. Coverage for this function should also be ensured.
I can help with writing tests for this part as well. Let me know if you need it.
Ticket Link
Related Links
Description
Steps to Reproduce / Test
GIF's
Summary by CodeRabbit
If
component for conditional rendering based on given conditions, with optional fallback rendering.babel.config.js
.app/utils/apiUtils.js
for improved functionality.setupTests.js
to handle logs more effectively.