Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code refator #80

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

code refator #80

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

himanshu-wedensday
Copy link
Contributor

@himanshu-wedensday himanshu-wedensday commented Apr 11, 2024

Ticket Link


Related Links


Description


Steps to Reproduce / Test


GIF's


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved error handling in the main application flow to enhance user feedback during failures.
    • Standardized the naming of components for better consistency and readability.
    • Unified the usage of utility functions across the application for enhanced performance and maintainability.
  • Tests
    • Updated testing configurations to use modern log handling practices in React Native environments.
  • New Features
    • Added a new If component for conditional rendering based on given conditions, with optional fallback rendering.
  • Chores
    • Converted the module export to an arrow function for consistency in babel.config.js.
    • Updated import statements and usage of utility functions in app/utils/apiUtils.js for improved functionality.
    • Modified testing setup in setupTests.js to handle logs more effectively.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes reflect a comprehensive effort to enhance error handling, ensure code consistency, and introduce functional improvements across various components and setup files in the application.

Changes

Files Change Summary
App.js, .../components/organisms/SimpsonsLoveWednesday/index.js Improved error handling in App.js by replacing a catch block with an alert call and standardized a styled component's name in SimpsonsLoveWednesday for consistency.
.../components/molecules/If/index.js, .../components/atoms/If/index.js Standardized lodash imports and usage, updated PropTypes declaration, and added a new conditional rendering component If.
babel.config.js Refactored the module export to use an arrow function for improved code structure.
setupTests.js Replaced deprecated log handling method with LogBox.ignoreAllLogs() for enhanced log management in React Native testing setup.

🐰✨
Oh hark! The code does change, it flows,
Like rivers twist, where'er it goes.
With logs so quiet, errors neat,
Our app now hums without a beat.
Cheers to the devs, with minds so bright,
Crafting code by day and night! 🌟🌙


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ab05e0 and 46ca722.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/utils/apiUtils.js (3 hunks)
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
Coverage annotations (🧪 jest-coverage-report-action) success (27)

app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 17-17: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 18-18: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 38-38: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 38-38: 🧾 Statement is not covered
Warning! Not covered statement


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 11-11: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 16-18: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 29-31: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 37-39: 🌿 Branch is not covered
Warning! Not covered branch


app/utils/apiUtils.js: [warning] 38-38: 🕹 Function is not covered
Warning! Not covered function

Additional comments not posted (1)
app/utils/apiUtils.js (1)

3-6: Imports for lodash functions camelCase, snakeCase, set, and get are correctly added.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 11, 2024

Coverage report

Total coverage

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 93.17% 191/205
🟡 Branches 87.8% 36/41
🟡 Functions 89.74% 70/78
🟢 Lines 94.88% 389/410

Status of coverage: 🟢 - ok, 🟡 - slightly more than threshold, 🔴 - under the threshold

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 46ca722

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ describe('<SimpsonsLoveWednesday />', () => {
};
const { getByText } = renderWithIntl(<SimpsonsLoveWednesday {...props} />);
expect(getByText(props.userErrorMessage)).toBeTruthy();
props.userErrorMessage = null;
set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using direct assignment instead of lodash/set for modifying props.userErrorMessage in tests for clarity and maintainability.

- set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null);
+ props.userErrorMessage = null;

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null);
props.userErrorMessage = null;

Comment on lines +31 to +39
const formattedMessageOptions = {
true: get(defaultFormattedMessages, key),
false: get(messages, key)
};
const formattedCondition = !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE;
return {
...formattedMessages,
[key]: get(formattedMessageOptions, formattedCondition)
};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider simplifying the logic in formatTranslationMessages to enhance readability. Using a ternary operator directly might be more straightforward than using a condition object.

- const formattedMessageOptions = {
-   true: get(defaultFormattedMessages, key),
-   false: get(messages, key)
- };
- const formattedCondition = !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE;
- return {
-   ...formattedMessages,
-   [key]: get(formattedMessageOptions, formattedCondition)
- };
+ return {
+   ...formattedMessages,
+   [key]: !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE ? get(defaultFormattedMessages, key) : get(messages, key)
+ };

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
const formattedMessageOptions = {
true: get(defaultFormattedMessages, key),
false: get(messages, key)
};
const formattedCondition = !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE;
return {
...formattedMessages,
[key]: get(formattedMessageOptions, formattedCondition)
};
return {
...formattedMessages,
[key]: !get(messages, key) && locale !== DEFAULT_LOCALE ? get(defaultFormattedMessages, key) : get(messages, key)
};

App.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 14 to 25
const apiClientOption = {
configApi: () => {
set(apiClients, type, createApiClientWithTransForm(Config.API_URL));
return get(apiClients, type);
},
default: () => {
set(apiClients, 'default', createApiClientWithTransForm(Config.API_URL));
return apiClients.default;
}
}
};
const clientGenerator = get(apiClientOption, type, apiClientOption.default);
return clientGenerator();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure the new logic in generateApiClient is covered by tests, especially since it involves dynamic property access which can be prone to errors if not handled correctly.

Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ describe('<SimpsonsLoveWednesday />', () => {
};
const { getByText } = renderWithIntl(<SimpsonsLoveWednesday {...props} />);
expect(getByText(props.userErrorMessage)).toBeTruthy();
props.userErrorMessage = null;
set(props, 'userErrorMessage', null);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we set here?

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

app/utils/apiUtils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +33 to +37
set(
response,
'data',
mapKeysDeep(data, keys => camelCase(keys))
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The transformation logic in createApiClientWithTransForm uses set and mapKeysDeep effectively for handling API response data. However, ensure this part of the code is covered by tests to prevent potential issues with data handling.

Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this transformation logic?

Comment on lines +45 to +49
set(
request,
'data',
mapKeysDeep(data, keys => snakeCase(keys))
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similarly, the request transformation logic is well implemented using set and mapKeysDeep. Coverage for this function should also be ensured.

I can help with writing tests for this part as well. Let me know if you need it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants