Upgrade alfajores to op

[aaronmgdr]

Alfajores will be upgraded from an L1 to an OP L2 at end of the month

This PR adds the relevant contract addresses to the chain definition

(pending review by team)

---

PR-Codex overview

This PR updates the Celo Alfajores chain configuration to include new contract addresses.

Detailed summary

• Updated Celo Alfajores chain with new contract addresses
• Added contracts: portal, disputeGameFactory, l2OutputOracle, l1StandardBridge, l2StandardBridge

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a774762

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
viem	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[vercel]

@aaronmgdr is attempting to deploy a commit to the Wevm Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[aaronmgdr]

for easier review this is

const contracts = {
  gasPriceOracle: { address: '0x420000000000000000000000000000000000000F' },
  l1Block: { address: '0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000015' },
  l2CrossDomainMessenger: {
    address: '0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000007',
  },
  l2Erc721Bridge: { address: '0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000014' },
  l2StandardBridge: { address: '0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000010' },
  l2ToL1MessagePasser: {
    address: '0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000016',
  },
} 

[aaronmgdr]

@jcortejoso please review addresses

[aaronmgdr]

@tmm I based the contracts on what base / op include in their config. there isn't any reason to have additional contract addresses defined right?

slightly related but would it be correct to add additional celo core contracts to this config?

[tmm]

there isn't any reason to have additional contract addresses defined right?

Correct, unless they are used internally in Viem. (Can search chain.contracts to see if you missed any.)

slightly related but would it be correct to add additional celo core contracts to this config?

You are welcome to add additional ones that you know will be used downstream, but similar to block explorers/RPC urls, we try to keep things lean when we can!