Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If the provisioning configuration is the same as saved copy, the file is not overwritten (fix duplicate code) #549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

soul2zimate
Copy link
Contributor

The Java doc on the method says it should be If the provisioning configuration is the same as saved copy, the file is not overwritten.

This is for 1.1.x code before the prospero-metadata split

Upstream PR: wildfly-extras/prospero-metadata#11

@spyrkob spyrkob added the 1.1.x label Jan 31, 2024
@spyrkob
Copy link
Collaborator

spyrkob commented Feb 6, 2024

Thanks @soul2zimate!

@spyrkob spyrkob merged commit d825ee7 into wildfly-extras:1.1.x Feb 6, 2024
5 checks passed
@soul2zimate soul2zimate deleted the fix-1.1.x branch February 7, 2024 00:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants