Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update broken links in OpenJDK rules #1049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2024
+8 −4
Merged

Update broken links in OpenJDK rules #1049

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions rules/rules-reviewed/openjdk11/openjdk8/java-removals.windup.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -47,7 +47,8 @@
As such, the use of `sun.reflect.Reflection` class and particular the `getCallerClass` method should no longer be needed.
Refer to the example changeset linked below.
</message>
<link title="Example changeset" href="https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/rt/rev/70f6fa01a32c"/>
<link title="Example changeset" href="https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/d647521fa83f0cebe9532642ee97ffc4356c8bb3"/>
<link title="JDK-8154203" href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8154203"/>
</hint>
</perform>
</rule>
Expand All @@ -64,7 +65,8 @@
`sun.reflect.CallerSensitive` annotation was deprecated in Java 9.
Refer to the example changeset linked below.
</message>
<link title="Example changeset" href="https://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/rt/rev/70f6fa01a32c"/>
<link title="Example changeset" href="https://github.com/openjdk/jfx/commit/d647521fa83f0cebe9532642ee97ffc4356c8bb3"/>
<link title="JDK-8154203" href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8154203"/>
</hint>
</perform>
</rule>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -196,7 +198,8 @@

In the long term, please consider using Variable Handles (see the link below)
</message>
<link href="https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/0a0a0986400e#l2.19" title="Test changes for JDK-8054494"/>
<link href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8054494" title="JDK-8054494"/>
<link href="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/083d9a2b6145a422bad64423675660c94bb32958#diff-12d7d73c9a167ec9451fe5e53373574adc02d9179cab3465e096a07d1aa79fc7" title="Test changes for JDK-8054494"/>
<link href="https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/193" title="Variable Handles"/>
</hint>
</perform>
Expand All @@ -216,7 +219,8 @@
For further examples on how to replace the `BASE64{encoder-decoder}` class with `Base64.{encoder-decoder}` one, refer to the "Code example" link below.
</message>
<link title="java.util.Base64 - Javadoc" href="https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Base64.html"/>
<link title="Code example" href="https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/9078c34437ab"/>
<link title="JDK-8006182" href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8006182"/>
<link title="Code example" href="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ec9e303630158405d0faaabb74f466f0a376c1fc"/>
<link title="OpenJDK - Original enhancement request" href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006182"/>
</hint>
</perform>
Expand Down
Loading