-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new fake data helper to response-templating.md #211
Conversation
Helper added as part of wiremock/wiremock#2438
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! Since the feature comers from an extension, it would be nice to document it explicitly. For now you can reference the GitHub repository while we're working on better Extension listing
_docs/response-templating.md
Outdated
@@ -631,6 +631,19 @@ Likewise decimals can be produced with or without bounds: | |||
|
|||
{% endraw %} | |||
|
|||
## Fake data helpers | |||
|
|||
These helpers produce random fake data of the desired types available in the [Data Faker library]([url](https://github.com/datafaker-net/datafaker)). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice to document how to get this extension, because it is not an out of the box one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I had written this when I had this implemented this feature as a core helper instead of an extension. Have marked this PR as draft and will update as per comments, thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, now we need a release
What's the process for that? |
@Shreya-7 see my ping on Slack about trying out the release flow ( |
Also, did I resolve the merge conflict correctly? |
I see some new changes got added from line 941 - was that intentional? |
sorry I've been away, busy with work stuff. Do you need me to setup the entire release workflow for this repo? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's integrate it given the extension is ready for local testing. I will do the release next week
References
Submitter checklist
it is submitted against the 2.x branch
Details: Contributor Guide