For reproducible test result

[shikokuchuo]

Prework

• I understand and agree to the Contributor Code of Conduct.
• I have already submitted a discussion topic or issue to discuss my idea with the maintainer.

Related GitHub issues and pull requests

• Ref: Test fails due to incomplete specification of random seed (RNGkind) #112

Summary

Amends patch for test as per comment: #112 (comment)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (5cfd904) 100.00% compared to head (54b75e9) 100.00%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the GitHub App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #114   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           22        22           
  Lines         1284      1284           
=========================================
  Hits          1284      1284           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[wlandau]

Would you see if 0a5ccfe fixes the original testing issue on your end? The goal of the test is to verify that the task used the correct seed, so I'm afraid set.seed() inside the task of the command defeats the purpose.

[shikokuchuo]

Hmm seems I automatically closed this when I was trying to pull from your latest branch... but that's fine as your latest commit does indeed fix this. Thanks!