Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(t)!: switch to implementation using atoms #29

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

macarie
Copy link
Member

@macarie macarie commented Mar 19, 2024

No description provided.

@macarie macarie force-pushed the nanostores branch 2 times, most recently from 6134827 to 2094835 Compare March 19, 2024 23:39
@macarie
Copy link
Member Author

macarie commented Apr 9, 2024

It may be worth exploring an implementation using https://github.com/proposal-signals/proposal-signals.

I will soon open another PR, keeping this one open.


What I don't like about this approach is that it ties the library to nanostore's interface.

Maybe it would be worth wrapping the atom and providing only a subset of features (get, set, listen).

@macarie
Copy link
Member Author

macarie commented Apr 27, 2024

A (native) event-driven implementation is in the works. That might be the solution @wluwd/t sticks to for the foreseeable future.

@macarie macarie closed this Jun 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant