Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note about stimulus-blurhash #194

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add note about stimulus-blurhash #194

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bb
Copy link

@bb bb commented Aug 26, 2022

I admit it's self-promo, but still useful.

Also, compared to the react-version it uses background-image with data URL instead of adding a canvas element to the DOM.

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
npm install --save blurhash
```

See [react-blurhash](https://github.com/woltapp/react-blurhash) to use blurhash with React.
See [react-blurhash](https://github.com/woltapp/react-blurhash) to use blurhash with React or [stimulus-blurhash](https://github.com/bb/stimulus-blurhash) to use it with Hotwire Stimulus.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this implementation should be listed under implementations in README!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can of course add both react-blurhash and stimulus-blurhash to the global README. However, neither of those are actual implementations. They both have the TypeScript implementation as a dependency. So I'd add both react-blurhash and stimulus-blurhash as sub-bullets of the TypeScript implementation? Or would you prefer somewhere else?

@jerry-git jerry-git added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants