Releases: xbrlus/cafr
Version 0.3 of the CAFR Taxonomy
The comment period for version 0.3 closed on May 8, 2020 - visit https://xbrl.us/cafr-demo for details and comments received on definitions, references, labels, as well as the structure of the taxonomy.
The entry point for this version of the CAFR Taxonomy is: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xbrlus/cafr/v1.0RC7/cafr_all_2020-05-01.xsd.
This is a demonstration release - this release is not a complete taxonomy.
This release illustrates how data standards can be created and used in the municipal marketplace. The standards are being developed by the XBRL US Standard Government Reporting Working Group to evaluate how standards can improve efficiencies by automating the process of creating, collecting, and analyzing government data.
| Sample inline XBRL CAFR | |
|---|---|
|
City of Bakersfield (California) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2019 - contributed by XBRL US Member Gray CPA Consulting |
|
|
College of DuPage (Illinois) Single Audit Report for the year ended June 30, 2019 - contributed by XBRL US Member IRIS Business Services, LLC |
|
|
County of Page (Virginia) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2019 - contributed by XBRL US Sole Practitioner Member Allyson Ugarte |
|
| Please note: all reported facts in these instances may not be tagged because of the limited number of elements created for this Demonstration Release of the CAFR taxonomy. | |
Change log for this taxonomy:
- updated since this model's initial release -- v1.0RC4...v1.0RC7
- compared with taxonomy model 0.1 -- v1.0RC1...v1.0RC7
Legal notice || Patent Notice
Version 0.2 of the CAFR Taxonomy
The entry point for this version of the CAFR Taxonomy is: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xbrlus/cafr/v1.0RC4/us-cafr_full-entry.xsd.
This is a demonstration release - this release is not a complete taxonomy.
This release illustrates how data standards can be created and used in the municipal marketplace. The standards are being developed by the XBRL US Standard Government Reporting Working Group to evaluate how standards can improve efficiencies by automating the process of creating, collecting, and analyzing government data.
Inline XBRL Samples
Below is a collection of member-contributed sample inline filings based on this release, displayed using the SEC's inline viewer. Click the name of the state, county or municipality to see examples.
| Sample inline XBRL CAFRs | |
|---|---|
|
County of Albemarle, Virginia as of June 30, 2017 City of Columbus, Ohio as of December 31, 2017 City of Los Angeles, California as of June 30, 2018 City of Los Angeles, California as of June 30, 2018 (Assets Only) County of McHenry Illinois as of November 30, 2017 |
County of San Diego, California as of June 30, 2018 County of Will, Illinois as of November 30, 2018 County of Will, Illinois as of November 30, 2017 County of Will, Illinois as of November 30, 2016 |
| Please note: all reported facts in these instances may not be tagged because of the limited number of elements created for this Demonstration Release of the CAFR taxonomy. | |
Change log for this taxonomy:
- updated since this model's initial release -- v1.0RC2...v1.0RC4
- compared with taxonomy model 0.1 -- v1.0RC1...v1.0RC4
Legal notice || Patent Notice
Version 0.1 of the CAFR Taxonomy
The entry point for the CAFR Taxonomy (Demonstration Release) is: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/xbrlus/cafr/v1.0RC1/cafr_2019-01-16.xsd.
This is an initial release of a taxonomy model - this release is not a complete taxonomy.
This is a Demonstration Release, to illustrate how data standards can be created and used in the municipal marketplace. The standards were developed by the XBRL US State and Local Government Disclosure Modernization Working Group as a pilot to test the premise that standards can improve efficiencies by automating the process of creating, collecting, and analyzing government data.
The Working Group solicited feedback during a 60-day public review period that ended on March 18, 2019. Input was requested on:
- Definitions and references for the elements. Are the definitions accurate? Are references appropriate? Should revisions or modifications be made?
- General input. Is the taxonomy structured appropriately? Is the documentation provided helpful and understandable?
Inline XBRL Samples
Below is a collection of member-contributed sample inline filings based on this release, displayed using the SEC's inline viewer. Click the name of the state, county or municipality to see examples.