Use namespace in DB #295
Use namespace in DB #295
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@neekolas has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 45 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the database initialization process in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Main
participant DB
participant Utils
Main->>Utils: BuildNamespace(options)
Utils-->>Main: namespace
Main->>DB: NewNamespacedDB(ctx, writerConnectionString, namespace, waitForDB, readTimeout)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pkg/utils/namespace.go (2)
14-14: Risk of namespace collisions due to hash truncationTruncating the hash to 12 characters (6 bytes) significantly increases the probability of collisions. With 6 bytes, you have 2^48 possible values, which might not be sufficient for a large-scale distributed system.
Consider:
- Using a longer prefix (e.g., 16 or 20 characters) to reduce collision probability
- Implementing collision detection in the database layer
- Adding a validation mechanism to ensure namespace uniqueness
8-15: Add unit tests for namespace generationThis is a critical function that affects database isolation. It needs comprehensive testing to ensure consistent behavior.
Would you like me to help create unit tests that cover:
- Normal operation with valid inputs
- Collision probability assessment
- Error cases with invalid inputs
- Consistency of namespace generation
cmd/replication/main.go (1)
60-65: Consider adding integration tests for namespaced DBThe database namespace change could affect data isolation. Consider adding integration tests to verify:
- Data isolation between different namespaces
- Proper cleanup/teardown in tests
- Namespace collision scenarios
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cmd/replication/main.go(1 hunks)pkg/utils/namespace.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pkg/utils/namespace.go (1)
14-14: Verify HexEncode function implementation
The code uses HexEncode which isn't imported but presumably exists in the same package.
Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
HexEncode implementation is correct and properly located
The HexEncode function is correctly implemented in the same package (pkg/utils/hex.go) and uses the standard encoding/hex package's EncodeToString function to convert byte data to a hexadecimal string. Since it's in the same package, no import is needed in namespace.go.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for HexEncode function definition
ast-grep --pattern 'func HexEncode($_) $_'
# Backup: use ripgrep if ast-grep doesn't find it
rg -p "func HexEncode"
Length of output: 362
cmd/replication/main.go (2)
63-63: Verify namespace generation consistency
The namespace is derived from server options, which could affect database isolation between different server instances.
✅ Verification successful
Namespace generation is correctly isolated and consistent
The BuildNamespace function in pkg/utils/namespace.go generates a unique namespace by hashing the signer's private key and nodes contract address, which ensures proper database isolation between different server instances. The implementation is deterministic and depends only on server-specific configuration, making it safe for use.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of BuildNamespace
ast-grep --pattern 'func BuildNamespace($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Look for other potential namespace usages
rg -A 5 'BuildNamespace'
Length of output: 656
60-65: Verify namespace initialization and database compatibility
The switch to NewNamespacedDB suggests a multi-tenant or isolation approach. This is a significant architectural change that requires careful consideration.
Let's verify the implementation details:
Consider the following architectural aspects:
- Ensure all database operations respect the namespace
- Verify that existing data migration scripts handle namespaced tables
- Document the namespace strategy for operational visibility
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the namespace implementation and migration handling.
Let me check one more aspect - the actual SQL migrations and database schema to understand how namespacing is implemented.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Database namespacing implementation is properly handled
The switch to NewNamespacedDB is well-implemented with the following key aspects:
- Creates a new database using the namespace as the database name
- Namespace is deterministically generated using server options (private key and contract address)
- Database creation is handled safely with proper connection management
- Existing migrations will run in the namespaced database context
- All tables (
node_info,gateway_envelopes, etc.) are automatically isolated by being created in the namespaced database
No architectural issues found as the isolation is handled at the database level rather than schema/table level, providing complete separation of data between different instances.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the database package for namespace handling
ast-grep --pattern 'func NewNamespacedDB($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check for any database migration files that might need updates
fd -e sql -e go migration
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of NewNamespacedDB
rg -A 10 "NewNamespacedDB"
# Check BuildNamespace implementation
rg -A 5 "BuildNamespace"
# Check migration code for namespace handling
cat pkg/migrations/migrations.go
# Look for any database operations that might need namespace awareness
ast-grep --pattern 'db.$_($$$)'
Length of output: 2984
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check SQL migration files
fd -e sql . pkg/migrations -x cat {}
# Check if namespace is used in table names or schemas
rg -A 5 "CREATE TABLE|CREATE SCHEMA"
# Look for any database configuration or schema setup
rg -A 10 "pgxpool.ParseConfig"
Length of output: 6506
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
3671479 to
c60671d
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
c4ab5f0 to
769a3f9
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
c60671d to
21e80d5
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
769a3f9 to
3d8ea11
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
21e80d5 to
6e15894
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
3d8ea11 to
f5bb7ba
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
6e15894 to
4e6c14c
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
f5bb7ba to
258b3a7
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
4e6c14c to
ac71c6b
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
258b3a7 to
a1f3f7e
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
ac71c6b to
de7bd67
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
a1f3f7e to
d0f0f50
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
de7bd67 to
b97c1ee
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
d0f0f50 to
d0c365c
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
branch
from
b97c1ee to
f1897ed
Compare
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
d0c365c to
0a2d620
Compare
Merge activity
|
neekolas
changed the base branch from
11-26-add_support_for_creating_namespaced_databases
to
graphite-base/295
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
3 times, most recently
from
bb8f74c to
6383a48
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
dev/contracts/deploy-testnet (1)
21-23: Document the rationale for commented-out contractsThe selective deployment of only the Nodes contract needs explanation, especially since it differs from local deployment.
Add a comment explaining the deployment strategy, for example:
-# deploy_contract src/GroupMessages.sol GroupMessages +# GroupMessages contract deployment temporarily disabled for namespace migration deploy_contract src/Nodes.sol Nodes -# deploy_contract src/IdentityUpdates.sol IdentityUpdates +# IdentityUpdates contract deployment temporarily disabled for namespace migration
🛑 Comments failed to post (1)
dev/contracts/deploy-ephemeral (1)
8-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling directives for script robustness
While the addition of
--broadcastis good, this script should include error handling directives for consistency with other deployment scripts.Add these lines at the beginning of the script:
#!/bin/bash +set -euo pipefail source dev/contracts/.envCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
neekolas
force-pushed
the
11-26-use_namespace_in_db
branch
from
6383a48 to
a7a562d
Compare
TL;DR
Added database namespace support based on private key and contract address
What changed?
BuildNamespacefunction that generates a unique namespace using the node's private key and contract addressHow to test?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
--broadcastoption for contract deployment commands, enabling transaction broadcasting.Bug Fixes