Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
XWIKI-22165: Home page icons do not have a text alternative #3123
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
XWIKI-22165: Home page icons do not have a text alternative #3123
Changes from 5 commits
9fc3b59
fb87604
f1b8e50
10f576c
df42d34
2f71bec
a0815ef
7d12a73
6ae4ff0
51edb3b
ac286c2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Sereza7 have you tried to build this module with the quality profile? It's an API it seems, and you're missing unstable annotations I think. And I'm surprised revapi is not complaining at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding methods to a class isn't breaking anything, so I wouldn't expect any errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, not an interface. Still missing the unstable annotations then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the quality profile, I hit the ClassFanOutComplexity on DisplayIconMacro, working on fixing it...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added the Unstable annotation in 7d12a73 👍
Also reduced the fanout complexity by choosing to use a paragraph block instead of a FormatBlock for the text alternative. Now passes
mvn clean install -f xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-icon/xwiki-platform-icon-macro -Pquality
successfully.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm sorry but using a paragraph block for the text alternative is not okay, you cannot nest a paragraph inside another paragraph and the icon macro needs to be usable in a paragraph.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reverted this change of block nature in 51edb3b .
Instead of this, I set some methods in their own class in order to reduce the ClassFanOutComplexity of DisplayIconMacro.
The PR with these new changes pass quality tests :)
mvn clean install -f xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-icon/xwiki-platform-icon-macro -Pquality
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went with a solution without components since those methods are quite specific and I don't think they'd need to be reused in another context.