Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(cpp): Introduce Type-specific Guidelines with rules for std::unordered_map. #28

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LinZhihao-723
Copy link
Member

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 commented Jan 17, 2025

References

This PR introduces a new section in C++ guideline: Type-specific Guidelines.
As the initial write-up, this PR contains rules for std::unordered_map.

Description

  • Ensure the newly added section can be successfully rendered with task serve.
  • Validated that the new guidelines were displayed correctly and that all links worked.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added comprehensive guidelines for using std::unordered_map in C++
    • Provided best practices for key management and map interactions
    • Recommended safer alternatives to the [] operator
    • Included links to relevant documentation for improved map handling

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new section in the C++ contribution guidelines focusing on type-specific guidelines for std::unordered_map. The documentation provides detailed insights into the potential pitfalls of using the [] operator with unordered maps, emphasizing safer and more efficient alternatives. The new section aims to guide developers in making more informed decisions when working with this container type, highlighting methods like contains, emplace, at, and try_emplace as recommended approaches.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/dev-guide/contrib-guides-cpp.md Added new "Type-specific Guidelines" section with a subsection on std::unordered_map

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • haiqi96
  • davidlion

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/dev-guide/contrib-guides-cpp.md (1)

163-174: Improve grammar and punctuation consistency.

Consider these refinements:

  • Line 163: Change "for access existing keys" to "for accessing existing keys"
  • Line 164: Replace "by accident" with "accidentally"
  • Lines 169, 171, 174: Add periods after each list item for consistency
-  * This behaviour is error-prone for access existing keys because:
-    * You could create a kv-pair by accident without explicitly knowing whether the corresponding
+  * This behaviour is error-prone for accessing existing keys because:
+    * You could accidentally create a kv-pair without explicitly knowing whether the corresponding
     key already existed.
   * This behaviour is inefficient for creating new kv-pairs because the value must be first default
     constructed.
   * Instead, you should use the following as required:
-    * Use [`contains`][std::unordered_map::contains] to check whether a key exists (available since
+    * Use [`contains`][std::unordered_map::contains] to check whether a key exists (available since
       C++20).
-    * Use [`emplace`][std::unordered_map::emplace] to construct and insert kv-pairs efficiently.
+    * Use [`emplace`][std::unordered_map::emplace] to construct and insert kv-pairs efficiently.
-    * Use [`at`][std::unordered_map::at] to access the value of a given key with internal sanity
+    * Use [`at`][std::unordered_map::at] to access the value of a given key with internal sanity
       checks.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~163-~163: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: .... * This behaviour is error-prone for access existing keys because: * You could ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~164-~164: ‘by accident’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...cause: * You could create a kv-pair by accident without explicitly knowing whether the ...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_BY_ACCIDENT)


[uncategorized] ~169-~169: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...se the following as required: * Use [contains][std::unordered_map::contains]...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~171-~171: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...available since C++20). * Use [emplace][std::unordered_map::emplace] t...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~174-~174: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...internal sanity checks. * Use [try_emplace][std::unordered_map::try_em...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0f8477 and b96bd7d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/dev-guide/contrib-guides-cpp.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/dev-guide/contrib-guides-cpp.md

[uncategorized] ~163-~163: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: .... * This behaviour is error-prone for access existing keys because: * You could ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~164-~164: ‘by accident’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...cause: * You could create a kv-pair by accident without explicitly knowing whether the ...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_BY_ACCIDENT)


[uncategorized] ~169-~169: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...se the following as required: * Use [contains][std::unordered_map::contains]...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~171-~171: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...available since C++20). * Use [emplace][std::unordered_map::emplace] t...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~174-~174: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...internal sanity checks. * Use [try_emplace][std::unordered_map::try_em...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/dev-guide/contrib-guides-cpp.md (3)

154-157: LGTM! Section headers are well-structured.

The new section headers follow the document's existing hierarchy and formatting conventions.


158-179: LGTM! Comprehensive and technically accurate guidelines.

The guidelines effectively explain the pitfalls of the [] operator and provide appropriate alternatives. The recommendation to maintain consistency across map-like containers is particularly valuable.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~163-~163: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: .... * This behaviour is error-prone for access existing keys because: * You could ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~164-~164: ‘by accident’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...cause: * You could create a kv-pair by accident without explicitly knowing whether the ...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_BY_ACCIDENT)


[uncategorized] ~169-~169: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...se the following as required: * Use [contains][std::unordered_map::contains]...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~171-~171: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...available since C++20). * Use [emplace][std::unordered_map::emplace] t...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~174-~174: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...internal sanity checks. * Use [try_emplace][std::unordered_map::try_em...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)


189-192: LGTM! Reference links are well-organized.

All method references are properly linked to their corresponding cppreference.com documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant