Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 6, 2019. It is now read-only.

Relations and Result Grouping Support #3

Open
wants to merge 91 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Relations and Result Grouping Support #3

wants to merge 91 commits into from

Conversation

lbochsler
Copy link

Hi Young

This is an initial version (pre-alpha) for result grouping and relations support (supports related fields, others than the ones from the base table). It's based on the latest views fixes, however it currently still has quite a few known issues. They are:

  • Indexing without any text/content field (empty _body field in Solr) does not work
  • The field handler for _value fields has to be set in hook_views_data_alter()
  • In the datasource admin section you must choose 'Do not use relationship' for node-reference fields in order for these to be indexed.
  • In Environment (Facets) for referenced fields, entity_id fields must be unchecked. Only _value fields can be used as facets.
  • If result grouping is activated in the backend and you add a groupfield in the datasource admin section, you must not remove this field in the field section above, because there is currently no check for fields defined as group-fields not being removable.
  • Multivalues and Shpinx backend stuff has not been adapted yet and may currently be broken.
  • Result grouping is configured in datasource section, nice would be views or at least environment (it probably belongs more in there because it affects taking data out of the index..)

Any feedback is welcome..

Luke

Adrian Rossouw and others added 30 commits October 1, 2010 18:38
… and the indexer is restarting.

The db api changes messed up a bunch of things, because the internal query builder in views was replaced
with the core one, but the existing api now wraps around it.
ui not tested yet.
… for the node access implementation.

this may be a reasonable comprimise.
i have no idea how to do the 'override global search box' thing.
Young Hahn and others added 30 commits December 2, 2010 13:19
…of these values needs to be implemented in custom plugins for the moment. 2) Pass raw data to the facet block in order to have greater theming flexibility.
Conflicts:
	views/searchlight_handler_field_facet_link.inc
…/searchlight

Conflicts:
	includes/SearchlightDatasource.inc
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants