Release #675
Release #675
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cahllagerfeld <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes encompass updates to several workflow files, dependency versions, and component modifications across the application. Formatting adjustments were made in workflow YAML files, while the Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (51)
src/types/pipeline-deployments.ts (1)
4-12: Consider adding documentation for new typesThe new type definitions enhance the structure for pipeline deployments. However, it would be beneficial to add brief comments explaining the purpose and usage of each new type, especially for
StepOutputInputwhich is defined differently from the others.This documentation would improve code maintainability and help other developers understand the intended use of these types.
src/app/settings/secrets/page.tsx (1)
18-24: Well-integrated link with a suggestion for improvementThe "Learn More" link is correctly integrated into the paragraph, maintaining all necessary attributes for security and styling. This is a good practice for improved readability and user experience.
Consider adding an
aria-labelto the link for better accessibility. For example:<a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://docs.zenml.io/how-to/interact-with-secrets" className="link text-primary-400" + aria-label="Learn more about configuring and managing pipeline secrets and configurations" > Learn More </a>This addition would provide more context for screen reader users without affecting the visual presentation.
src/app/settings/secrets/SecretTooltip.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM: Efficient icon import, with a minor suggestion.The import of the
Infoicon as a React component from an SVG file is a good practice. It allows for easy manipulation of the icon as a React component.Consider renaming the imported component to
InfoIconfor better clarity and to avoid potential naming conflicts with other "Info" related components or variables.-import Info from "@/assets/icons/info.svg?react"; +import InfoIcon from "@/assets/icons/info.svg?react";
11-33: LGTM: Well-implemented tooltip with a suggestion for accessibility.The
SecretTooltipcomponent is well-implemented, providing a clear and informative tooltip with appropriate content. The use of theCodesnippetcomponent for displaying the code is a good choice.Consider adding an
aria-labelto the tooltip trigger for better accessibility:-<TooltipTrigger> +<TooltipTrigger aria-label="Information about using secrets"> <Info className="h-4 w-4 shrink-0 fill-theme-text-tertiary" /> </TooltipTrigger>This will provide context for screen reader users about the purpose of the tooltip.
src/app/pipelines/RunsTab/DeleteRunAlert.tsx (1)
32-37: LGTM: Enhanced alert dialog content.The addition of
DeleteAlertContentBodywith clear warning messages improves the user experience by providing more context about the deletion action. This is a good practice for critical operations.Consider personalizing the message when deleting a single run. You could use a ternary operator to conditionally render the message:
<DeleteAlertContentBody> - <p>Are you sure?</p> + <p>{selectedRuns.length >= 2 ? 'Are you sure?' : `Are you sure you want to delete this run?`}</p> <p>This action cannot be undone.</p> </DeleteAlertContentBody>This small change would make the alert more specific when dealing with a single run deletion.
src/app/pipelines/PipelinesTab/DeletePipelineAlert.tsx (1)
32-37: LGTM: Enhanced delete confirmation dialog.The addition of
DeleteAlertContentBodywith clear, concise content improves the user experience by providing more context about the deletion action. The implementation is correct and aligns with the component changes.Consider making the confirmation question more specific:
- <p>Are you sure?</p> + <p>Are you sure you want to delete the selected pipeline(s)?</p>This change would provide more context to the user about what they're confirming.
src/app/runs/[id]/RunActionMenu.tsx (2)
1-12: LGTM! Consider adding a props interface for future extensibility.The imports and component declaration look good. The component is correctly exported as a named function, and the necessary dependencies are imported.
Consider adding a props interface for the
RunActionsMenucomponent, even if it currently doesn't accept any props. This will make it easier to extend the component in the future if needed:interface RunActionsMenuProps { // Add props here when needed } export function RunActionsMenu({}: RunActionsMenuProps) { // ... }
22-30: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for improved accessibility.The component demonstrates good accessibility practices with the use of
sr-onlytext for the dropdown trigger button. The styling is consistent with the design system, using appropriate utility classes and SVG icons.To further improve accessibility, consider adding ARIA attributes to the dropdown menu:
- <DropdownMenu open={dropdownOpen} onOpenChange={setDropdownOpen}> + <DropdownMenu open={dropdownOpen} onOpenChange={setDropdownOpen} aria-label="Run actions menu"> - <DropdownMenuTrigger className="z-10"> + <DropdownMenuTrigger className="z-10" aria-haspopup="true" aria-expanded={dropdownOpen}> <HorizontalDots className="h-5 w-5 shrink-0 fill-theme-text-secondary" /> <p className="sr-only">Run Actions</p> </DropdownMenuTrigger> - <DropdownMenuContent className="z-10" align="end" sideOffset={1}> + <DropdownMenuContent className="z-10" align="end" sideOffset={1} role="menu"> - <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => setDeleteOpen(true)} className="space-x-2"> + <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => setDeleteOpen(true)} className="space-x-2" role="menuitem"> <Trash className="h-3 w-3 fill-neutral-400" /> <p>Delete</p> </DropdownMenuItem> </DropdownMenuContent> </DropdownMenu>These ARIA attributes will provide more context to assistive technologies, enhancing the overall accessibility of the component.
src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/page.tsx (2)
26-32: Good addition of secret details and copy functionality.The new structure nicely organizes the secret information, displaying the secret name and a truncated secretId. The addition of the
CopyButtoncomponent improves user experience by allowing easy copying of the full secretId.Consider adding an aria-label to the div containing the secretId and CopyButton to improve accessibility. For example:
- <div className="group/copybutton flex items-center space-x-1"> + <div className="group/copybutton flex items-center space-x-1" aria-label="Secret ID with copy option">
Line range hint
11-35: Well-structured component with enhanced functionality.The overall structure of the
SecretDetailsPagecomponent has been improved with the addition of the secret details section. The component maintains a good balance between displaying information and providing user interaction (via theCopyButton). The use of React hooks remains consistent, and the integration with the existingSecretDetailTablecomponent is preserved.As the component grows, consider extracting the secret details section into a separate component for better modularity and easier testing. This could look like:
const SecretHeader = ({ name, id }) => ( <div> <h1 className="text-text-xl font-semibold">{name}</h1> <div className="group/copybutton flex items-center space-x-1" aria-label="Secret ID with copy option"> <div className="text-theme-text-secondary">{id.slice(0, 8)}</div> <CopyButton copyText={id} /> </div> </div> ); // In the main component <SecretHeader name={secretDetail?.name} id={secretId} />src/components/dag-visualizer/PreviewArtifact.tsx (2)
15-37: LGTM with a suggestion: Consider using an enum or object for status mapping.The component logic effectively handles different execution statuses and provides a good visual representation with a tooltip. However, the status checking could be improved for maintainability.
Consider refactoring the status check to use an enum or object for better maintainability:
const STATUS_ICON_MAP: Record<ExecutionStatus, ExecutionStatus> = { failed: "failed", completed: "completed", running: "running", // Add other statuses as needed }; // Then in the component: <ExecutionStatusIcon status={STATUS_ICON_MAP[data.status] || "running"} className="h-4 w-4 fill-primary-400" />This approach would make it easier to add or modify statuses in the future without changing the component logic.
22-30: Enhance accessibility for screen readers.While the tooltip improves user experience, consider adding explicit ARIA attributes to enhance accessibility for screen reader users.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add an
aria-labelto the main div:- <div className="flex h-[50px] min-w-0 max-w-[300px] items-center justify-center gap-1 rounded-rounded border border-primary-100 bg-primary-25 p-1 opacity-50"> + <div className="flex h-[50px] min-w-0 max-w-[300px] items-center justify-center gap-1 rounded-rounded border border-primary-100 bg-primary-25 p-1 opacity-50" aria-label={`Artifact: ${data.label}, Status: ${data.status}`}>
- Add an
aria-hiddenattribute to the icon to prevent screen readers from announcing it:- <ExecutionStatusIcon - status={isFailed ? "failed" : isCompleted ? "completed" : "running"} - className="h-4 w-4 fill-primary-400" - /> + <ExecutionStatusIcon + status={isFailed ? "failed" : isCompleted ? "completed" : "running"} + className="h-4 w-4 fill-primary-400" + aria-hidden="true" + />These changes will provide more context to screen reader users without affecting the visual presentation.
src/components/Infobox.tsx (1)
13-14: LGTM: New error variant added to infoBoxVariants.The new
errorvariant is correctly added to theinfoBoxVariantsobject, following the existing pattern. The styling is consistent with error conventions.For consistency with the
warningvariant, consider using a more specific color name for the background, likebg-[#FEEFEF](assuming it's the correct shade of light red), instead ofbg-error-50. This would make it easier to fine-tune the exact shade if needed in the future.src/components/dag-visualizer/StepNode.tsx (3)
30-37: Good use of conditional styling, consider extracting complex conditions.The use of
clsxfor conditional styling is a good practice. The addition of a visual indicator for failed steps improves the user experience.Consider extracting the complex condition for the border color into a separate variable or function to improve readability. For example:
const isFailed = data.body?.status === "failed"; const borderColorClass = isFailed ? "border-error-200" : "border-theme-border-moderate hover:border-neutral-400 data-[selected=true]:border-theme-border-bold"; // Then in the className: className={clsx( "h-[50px] max-w-[300px] rounded-md border bg-theme-surface-primary transition-all duration-200 hover:shadow-md data-[selected=true]:shadow-md", borderColorClass )}This approach would make the JSX more readable and the condition more reusable if needed elsewhere.
40-43: Consistent use ofdata.body?.status, consider extracting for DRY principle.The change to use
data.body?.statusfor both the background color and icon is consistent with earlier usage. The optional chaining is appropriately maintained.To adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle and improve maintainability, consider extracting
data.body?.statusinto a variable:const status = data.body?.status; // Then use it in both places: <div className={`rounded-sm p-0.5 ${getExecutionStatusBackgroundColor(status)}`}> <ExecutionStatusIcon status={status} className="h-4 w-4" /> </div>This would reduce repetition and make it easier to update if the data structure changes in the future.
27-27: Address the TODO comment about shadow in the design system.There's an unresolved TODO comment regarding checking the shadow in the design system. It's important to address these comments to ensure consistency with the design system and to maintain code quality.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this task? The issue could include:
- A reminder to check the shadow specifications in the design system.
- A task to update the component's shadow styles to match the design system.
- A note to remove the TODO comment once addressed.
Let me know if you'd like me to proceed with creating this issue.
src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/SecretDetailTable.tsx (3)
16-32: Good implementation of state management and data fetching, with a minor suggestion.The use of React Query for data fetching and the handling of loading and error states are well implemented. The local state for search functionality is also correctly set up.
However, there's room for improvement in type safety:
Consider adding a type guard or assertion for
secretDetail.data.body?.valuesto ensure it's treated asRecord<string, string>. This will provide better type safety and prevent potential runtime errors. For example:const values = secretDetail.data.body?.values; const keyValues = (values && typeof values === 'object') ? Object.entries(values as Record<string, string>).map(([key, value]) => ({ key, value })) : [];
34-56: Well-structured UI elements with a suggestion for accessibility.The implementation of the search input and edit button is clean and follows good practices. The use of controlled components and reusable dialog components is commendable.
To improve accessibility, consider adding an aria-label to the search input. This will provide more context for screen readers. For example:
<Input type="text" placeholder="Search Keys..." value={searchTerm} onChange={(e) => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} inputSize="md" + aria-label="Search secret keys" />
57-62: Efficient use of DataTable with a suggestion for large datasets.The implementation of the DataTable is clean and efficient, with good separation of concerns. The use of filtered data and externally defined columns promotes modularity and reusability.
Consider implementing pagination for the DataTable to handle potentially large datasets more efficiently. This would improve performance and user experience when dealing with a large number of secret key-value pairs. You could add a pagination prop to the DataTable component if it supports it, or implement custom pagination logic if needed.
src/app/runs/[id]/DeleteRunAlert.tsx (3)
15-20: LGTM: Component declaration and hook usage are correct.The component follows React best practices for function components and hook usage. However, consider adding a check for the presence of 'runId' in the URL parameters to improve robustness.
Consider updating the runId extraction to handle cases where it might be undefined:
const { runId } = useParams(); if (!runId) { // Handle the case where runId is not present in the URL // For example, show an error message or redirect return null; }
20-42: LGTM: Deletion logic and error handling are well-implemented.The success and error handling for the run deletion process are comprehensive. The use of queryClient to invalidate the 'runs' query ensures data consistency, and the navigation after successful deletion is appropriate.
Consider adding more specific error handling:
onError: (e) => { console.error('Error deleting run:', e); toast({ // ... existing toast configuration description: e.message || 'An unexpected error occurred while deleting the run.', }); }This addition logs the error for debugging purposes and provides a fallback message if
e.messageis undefined.
43-45: Remove unnecessary 'async' keyword.The
handleDeletefunction doesn't useawait, so theasynckeyword is unnecessary.Update the function declaration:
function handleDelete() { mutate({ runId }); }src/components/dag-visualizer/ArtifactNode.tsx (2)
22-26: LGTM! Consider a minor readability improvement.The new
getTypeFromArtifactfunction is a good addition for extracting the type name. It effectively handles the new data structure.Consider this minor refactoring for improved readability:
function getTypeFromArtifact(str: string) { - const parts = str.split("."); - const lastPart = parts[parts.length - 1]; - return lastPart; + return str.split(".").pop() || ""; }This change combines the operations and handles the case where the string might be empty.
46-47: LGTM! Consider clarifying the comment.The change to use
getTypeFromArtifact(data.body?.data_type.attribute || "")for displaying the artifact type is good. It aligns with the new data structure and handles potential undefined values.Consider updating the comment to provide more context:
-{/* As artifact_type doesn't correspond to the last part of the string */} +{/* Extract the type name from data_type.attribute as artifact_type is no longer available */}This change clarifies why we're using
getTypeFromArtifactanddata_type.attribute.src/components/DeleteAlertDialog.tsx (2)
33-33: LGTM: Improved component flexibility.The changes to
DeleteAlertContentenhance its reusability by allowing custom content to be passed as children. This is a good improvement that aligns with React's composability principle.Consider adding a default value for the
childrenprop to maintain backwards compatibility:->(({ handleDelete, title, children }, ref) => { +>(({ handleDelete, title, children = null }, ref) => {This change ensures that the component works correctly even if no children are provided, maintaining compatibility with existing usage.
Also applies to: 53-53
75-77: LGTM: New component enhances consistency and flexibility.The
DeleteAlertContentBodycomponent is a good addition that provides consistent styling for alert dialog body content while allowing for customization through theclassNameprop.Consider adding a more specific type for the
childrenprop to improve type safety:-export function DeleteAlertContentBody({ children, className }: HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>) { +export function DeleteAlertContentBody({ children, className }: HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement> & { children: ReactNode }) {This change explicitly declares that
childrenis of typeReactNode, which is more precise than the implicitanytype fromHTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>.src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/columns.tsx (2)
8-19: LGTM: ValueCell component is well-implemented with a minor suggestion.The ValueCell component effectively manages the visibility of secret values using local state. The toggle functionality and dots representation are well-implemented, maintaining the security of the secret value.
Consider adding a title attribute to the EyeIcon for better accessibility:
-<EyeIcon onClick={() => setIsVisible(!isVisible)} className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0" /> +<EyeIcon + onClick={() => setIsVisible(!isVisible)} + className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0" + title={isVisible ? "Hide value" : "Show value"} +/>
21-66: LGTM: getSecretDetailColumn function is well-structured with a suggestion for improvement.The function effectively defines the table columns for displaying secret details. The inclusion of a tooltip with a code snippet in the key column is particularly useful for users. The use of the ValueCell component for the value column and the SecretTableDropDown for actions provide good functionality and security.
Consider extracting the code snippet generation into a separate function for better maintainability:
function generateSecretRetrievalCode(secretName: string, key: string): string { return `from zenml.client import Client secret = Client().get_secret(${secretName}) # 'secret.secret_values' will contain a dictionary with all key-value pairs within your secret. secret.secret_values["${key}"] `; } // Then in the cell render function: const code = generateSecretRetrievalCode(name, row.original.key);This refactoring would make the code more modular and easier to maintain if the code snippet format needs to change in the future.
package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-86: Consider a comprehensive dependency reviewGiven the update to React and the ESLint plugin, it might be beneficial to review and potentially update other dependencies as well. This ensures optimal compatibility and takes advantage of the latest features and bug fixes across your project's ecosystem.
Consider the following steps:
- Review all dependencies for available updates.
- Check for any breaking changes in major version updates.
- Update dependencies in batches, starting with those closely related to React.
- Run thorough tests after each batch of updates.
You can use the following command to see outdated packages:
npm outdatedFor a visual dependency graph to understand update impacts:
npx npm-check-updatesRemember to update your lock file (package-lock.json or yarn.lock) after any changes to ensure consistency across environments.
src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/AlertPanels.tsx (4)
7-22: LGTM: FailedPanel component is well-structured.The FailedPanel component is cleanly implemented and follows React best practices. The use of InfoBox for error messaging is appropriate, and the inclusion of a "Review" button provides good user experience.
Consider exploring alternatives for hash navigation, such as:
- Using
react-router-hash-linkfor smoother in-page navigation.- Implementing a custom solution using
useRefandscrollIntoView.This could enhance the user experience by providing smoother scrolling to the orchestrator section.
24-39: LGTM: InitializingPanel component is consistent with FailedPanel.The InitializingPanel component follows the same structure as FailedPanel, which is excellent for maintainability. The messaging is appropriate for an initializing state.
To reduce code duplication and improve maintainability, consider creating a shared component for both FailedPanel and InitializingPanel. This component could accept props for the message, button text, and InfoBox intent. For example:
interface AlertPanelProps { message: string; buttonText: string; intent: "error" | "info"; } function AlertPanel({ message, buttonText, intent }: AlertPanelProps) { return ( <InfoBox className="truncate" intent={intent}> <div className="flex items-center justify-between space-x-2"> <p className="truncate">{message}</p> <Button intent={intent === "error" ? "danger" : "default"} asChild> <a href="#orchestrator-collapsible">{buttonText}</a> </Button> </div> </InfoBox> ); }This approach would allow you to create FailedPanel and InitializingPanel as simple function calls to AlertPanel with different props.
41-55: LGTM: AlertPanels component is well-implemented with room for minor improvements.The AlertPanels component is well-structured and effectively uses hooks for data fetching and URL parameter access. The conditional rendering logic is clear and handles different pipeline run states appropriately.
Consider the following improvements:
Instead of using type assertion for
runId, use optional chaining and provide a default value:const { runId = '' } = useParams<{ runId?: string }>();Use optional chaining for nested object properties to improve readability:
const orchestrator_url = data?.metadata?.run_metadata?.orchestrator_url; const orchestrator_logs = data?.metadata?.run_metadata?.orchestrator_logs_url;Consider using early returns for better readability:
if (isError || isPending) return <Skeleton className="h-[100px]" />; if (!data) return null; const { status } = data.body ?? {}; const { orchestrator_url, orchestrator_logs_url } = data.metadata?.run_metadata ?? {}; if (status === "initializing" && (orchestrator_logs_url || orchestrator_url)) { return <InitializingPanel />; } if (status === "failed" && orchestrator_logs_url) { return <FailedPanel />; } return null;These changes would make the code more robust and easier to read.
1-55: Overall: Well-structured component with room for optimization.The AlertPanels component and its sub-components are well-implemented and follow React best practices. The file is focused on a single responsibility, which is excellent for maintainability.
To further improve the code:
Implement the shared AlertPanel component as suggested earlier to reduce duplication between FailedPanel and InitializingPanel.
Consider extracting the logic for determining which panel to show into a separate function for better testability:
function getPanelType(status: string, orchestrator_url?: string, orchestrator_logs?: string) { if (status === "initializing" && (orchestrator_logs || orchestrator_url)) { return "initializing"; } if (status === "failed" && orchestrator_logs) { return "failed"; } return null; }Then use it in the AlertPanels component:
const panelType = getPanelType(data.body?.status, orchestrator_url, orchestrator_logs); if (panelType === "initializing") return <InitializingPanel />; if (panelType === "failed") return <FailedPanel />; return null;If these components are used elsewhere in the application, consider moving them to a separate file for reusability.
These changes would enhance the maintainability and testability of the code while preserving its current functionality.
src/app/pipelines/RunsTab/RunDropdown.tsx (1)
71-76: Improved alert dialog structure, consider specifying the action.The changes enhance the alert dialog structure by introducing the
DeleteAlertContentBodycomponent, which improves reusability and maintainability. The confirmation messages are clear and follow best practices for user interactions.Consider making the confirmation text more specific to the action being performed:
<DeleteAlertContentBody> - <p>Are you sure?</p> - <p>This action cannot be undone.</p> + <p>Are you sure you want to delete this run?</p> + <p>This action cannot be undone and may affect related data or workflows.</p> </DeleteAlertContentBody>This change would provide users with more context about the specific action they're confirming.
src/app/pipelines/PipelinesTab/PipelineDropdown.tsx (1)
70-75: LGTM: Alert dialog content structure improved.The
DeleteAlertContentcomponent now properly wraps the newDeleteAlertContentBodycomponent, improving the structure and reusability of the alert dialog. The confirmation text enhances user experience by clearly stating the consequences of the action.Consider making the confirmation text more specific to pipeline deletion:
<DeleteAlertContentBody> - <p>Are you sure?</p> - <p>This action cannot be undone.</p> + <p>Are you sure you want to delete this pipeline?</p> + <p>This action cannot be undone and may affect dependent components.</p> </DeleteAlertContentBody>This change provides more context about the specific action being performed and its potential impact.
src/components/ExecutionStatus.tsx (2)
5-5: Consider clarifying icon naming conventionThe recent changes have swapped the imports for
RunningandInitializingicons. While this change is functionally correct, it might lead to confusion in the future. Consider either:
- Renaming the imported icons to match their visual representation (e.g.,
DotsCircleinstead ofInitializing).- Adding a comment to explain why the "running" icon is represented by dots and the "initializing" icon by a running symbol.
This will improve code clarity and maintainability.
Also applies to: 7-7
76-83: Approved: Good enhancement to visual feedbackThe changes to the
Runningcase in theExecutionStatusIconcomponent are well-implemented:
- The use of animation enhances the visual representation of the running status.
- The
cnfunction is correctly used for class merging.- The 5-second animation duration is reasonable.
- The
motion-reduce:animate-noneclass is a great accessibility consideration.For consistency, consider extracting the animation classes into a separate variable or constant, similar to how
classNamesis used. This would make it easier to maintain and reuse these classes if needed elsewhere.const animationClasses = "animate-spin [animation-duration:_5s] motion-reduce:animate-none"; // Then in the JSX: className={cn(animationClasses, classNames)}src/app/settings/secrets/columns.tsx (1)
19-52: LGTM: Enhanced "Secret" column with improved interactivityThe changes to the "Secret" column significantly improve user interaction and information display. The use of
Linkfor navigation and the addition ofSecretTooltipenhance the user experience.Consider extracting the
codevariable definition to a separate function for better readability:cell: ({ getValue, row }) => { - const code = `from zenml.client import Client -secret = Client().get_secret(${row.original.name}) -`; + const getSecretCode = (secretName: string) => `from zenml.client import Client +secret = Client().get_secret(${secretName}) +`; + const code = getSecretCode(row.original.name); return ( // ... rest of the component ); }src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Orchestrator.tsx (3)
1-15: Imports look good, consider grouping them.The imports are well-organized and relevant to the component's functionality. Good job on separating server and client components from the react-component-library.
Consider grouping the imports by their source (external libraries, local components, types) for better readability. For example:
// External libraries import { useState } from "react"; import { useParams } from "react-router-dom"; import { Skeleton } from "@zenml-io/react-component-library/components/server"; import { CollapsibleContent, CollapsibleHeader, CollapsiblePanel, CollapsibleTrigger } from "@zenml-io/react-component-library/components/client"; // Local components and hooks import { usePipelineRun } from "@/data/pipeline-runs/pipeline-run-detail-query"; import { KeyValue } from "@/components/KeyValue"; import { CopyButton } from "@/components/CopyButton"; // Assets import ChevronDown from "@/assets/icons/chevron-down.svg?react"; // Types import { MetadataMap } from "@/types/common";
16-29: Component structure looks good, consider using TypeScript'sas const.The component structure and hooks usage are well-implemented. Good job on handling both loading and error states.
For better type safety, consider using
as constwhen destructuringuseParams:const { runId } = useParams() as { runId: string } as const;This ensures that
runIdis treated as a read-only string, which aligns better with how React Router typically provides route parameters.
31-102: Render logic is well-implemented, consider adding ARIA labels.The UI components and render logic are well-structured, providing a good user experience with collapsible panels, links, and copy buttons. Excellent job on handling cases where data might not be available.
To improve accessibility, consider adding ARIA labels to the collapsible trigger and copy buttons. For example:
<CollapsibleTrigger className="flex w-full" aria-label="Toggle orchestrator details"> {/* ... */} </CollapsibleTrigger> <CopyButton copyText={orchestrator_url.body.value} aria-label="Copy orchestrator URL" />This will help screen reader users understand the purpose of these interactive elements.
src/app/settings/secrets/AddSecretDialog.tsx (1)
169-178: Improved accessibility, but further enhancements possible.The changes improve the semantic structure and accessibility of the password visibility toggle by using a
<button>element instead of a<div>. Thetype="button"attribute prevents unintended form submission, which is a good practice.To further enhance accessibility:
- Add an
aria-labelto describe the button's function.- Use
aria-pressedto indicate the toggle state.- Consider adding a visual indicator of the current state.
Here's a suggested improvement:
<button type="button" onClick={() => { const showPassword = watch(`keysValues.${index}.showPassword`); setValue(`keysValues.${index}.showPassword`, !showPassword); }} - className="absolute inset-y-1 right-0 flex items-center pb-1 pr-3" + className="absolute inset-y-1 right-0 flex items-center pb-1 pr-3" + aria-label="Toggle password visibility" + aria-pressed={watch(`keysValues.${index}.showPassword`)} > - <EyeIcon className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0" /> + <EyeIcon className={`h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0 ${watch(`keysValues.${index}.showPassword`) ? 'text-primary-600' : ''}`} /> </button>This change adds an
aria-labelfor screen readers, usesaria-pressedto indicate the toggle state, and applies a color change to visually indicate the active state.src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Details.tsx (2)
Line range hint
66-66: Consider improving grid responsiveness.The integration of new elements into the existing structure is done well, maintaining the consistent styling. However, the fixed 3-column grid might not be optimal for all screen sizes.
Consider using a more flexible grid system or CSS Grid's
auto-fitfor better responsiveness:- <dl className="grid grid-cols-1 gap-x-[10px] gap-y-2 md:grid-cols-3 md:gap-y-4"> + <dl className="grid grid-cols-1 gap-x-[10px] gap-y-2 md:grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(200px, 1fr)) md:gap-y-4">This change would allow the grid to adapt to different screen sizes more flexibly.
Line range hint
44-45: Improve error handling and loading states.While the current implementation handles errors and loading states, there's room for improvement in terms of user experience:
- Error state: Instead of returning null, consider displaying an error message to inform the user about what went wrong.
- Loading state: The fixed-size Skeleton might not accurately represent the actual content size.
Consider implementing these improvements:
- For error handling:
if (isError) return <ErrorMessage message="Failed to load pipeline run details. Please try again later." />;
- For loading state:
if (isPending) return <DetailsSkeleton />;Where
DetailsSkeletonis a custom component that more accurately represents the structure of the Details component.These changes would provide a better user experience during error and loading states.
src/app/settings/secrets/EditSecretDialog.tsx (1)
203-209: Excellent accessibility improvement!Great job on replacing the
divwith abuttonelement for toggling password visibility. This change enhances accessibility and keyboard navigation. The explicittype="button"is also a good practice to prevent unintended form submissions.Consider adding
cursor-pointerto the button element to maintain consistent visual feedback for users:<button type="button" onClick={() => togglePasswordVisibility(index)} - className="absolute inset-y-1 right-0 flex items-center pb-1 pr-3" + className="absolute inset-y-1 right-0 flex items-center pb-1 pr-3 cursor-pointer" > <EyeIcon className="h-4 w-4 flex-shrink-0" /> </button>src/components/steps/step-sheet/DetailsTab.tsx (2)
226-307: LGTM: OrchestratorCard component is well-implemented.The new
OrchestratorCardcomponent is well-structured and follows React best practices. It effectively displays orchestrator-related information, handles different states appropriately, and maintains consistency with the application's design patterns.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider extracting the URL rendering logic into a separate component to reduce duplication. For example:
const URLWithCopy = ({ url }: { url: string }) => ( <div className="group/copybutton flex items-center gap-0.5"> <a className="truncate underline transition-all duration-200 hover:decoration-transparent" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href={url} > {url} </a> <CopyButton copyText={url} /> </div> );This component could then be used for both the Orchestrator URL and Orchestrator Logs fields, reducing code duplication and improving maintainability.
Line range hint
1-307: Suggestion: Add documentation for component usage.The file structure with separate
StepDetailsTabandOrchestratorCardcomponents is good for maintainability. However, it's not immediately clear how these components are intended to be used together.Consider adding a brief comment at the top of the file or in the component definitions to explain:
- The purpose of each component
- How they are intended to be used together
- Any dependencies or requirements for using these components
This documentation will help other developers understand the design and use these components correctly in the future.
src/app/runs/[id]/Dag.tsx (1)
28-34: Consider providing more specific error messages based on the error sourceCurrently, a generic error message is displayed: "There was an error loading the DAG visualization." To improve user experience and aid in debugging, consider specifying whether the error originated from
pipelineRunorpipelineDeployment. For example, you could display distinct messages or include error details when appropriate.src/app/runs/[id]/useDag.tsx (2)
35-39: Ensure type safety when castingstep_configurations.When casting
pipelineDeployment.data?.metadata?.step_configurationsasRecord<string, StepOutput>, there's a risk ifstep_configurationsis undefined. Consider adding a default empty object or a type guard to prevent potential runtime errors.You could modify the code as:
return extractPlaceholderLayout( - (pipelineDeployment.data?.metadata?.step_configurations as Record<string, StepOutput>) ?? {} + ((pipelineDeployment.data?.metadata?.step_configurations ?? {}) as Record<string, StepOutput>) );
41-43: Ensure safe casting ofstepsinrealNodes.Casting
(pipelineRun.data?.metadata?.steps as StepDict)assumesstepsis not undefined. To enhance safety, add a default or a check before casting to avoid unexpected errors.Adjust the code as follows:
return extractExistingNodes( - (pipelineRun.data?.metadata?.steps as StepDict) ?? {} + ((pipelineRun.data?.metadata?.steps ?? {}) as StepDict) );src/components/dag-visualizer/extract-layout.ts (1)
66-67: Use nullish coalescing operator??instead of logical OR||for default valuesTo ensure that falsy values like
nullorundefinedare correctly handled while defaultingexternalInputs, use the nullish coalescing operator??instead of||. This provides more precise control over default values.Apply this diff for consistency:
const externalInputs = - (step.config.external_input_artifacts as Record<string, ExternalArtifactConfig>) || {}; + (step.config.external_input_artifacts as Record<string, ExternalArtifactConfig>) ?? {};
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (2)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlsrc/assets/icons/running.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (52)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (0 hunks)
- .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/app/onboarding/Header.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/pipelines/PipelinesTab/DeletePipelineAlert.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/pipelines/PipelinesTab/PipelineDropdown.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/pipelines/RunsTab/DeleteRunAlert.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/pipelines/RunsTab/RunDropdown.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/Dag.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/DeleteRunAlert.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/Header.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/RunActionMenu.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/AlertPanels.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Details.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Info.tsx (0 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Orchestrator.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/runs/[id]/useDag.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/AddSecretDialog.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/EditSecretDialog.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/SecretTooltip.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/SecretsTable.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/SecretDetailTable.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/columns.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/columns.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/secretsDetail/SecretDetailTable.tsx (0 hunks)
- src/app/settings/secrets/secretsDetail/columns.tsx (0 hunks)
- src/components/DeleteAlertDialog.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/components/ExecutionStatus.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Infobox.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/artifacts/artifact-node-sheet/DetailCards.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/ArtifactNode.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/Controls.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/PreviewArtifact.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/PreviewStep.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/SmartEdge.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/StepNode.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/add-manual-artifacts.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/extract-layout.ts (1 hunks)
- src/components/dag-visualizer/layout.ts (2 hunks)
- src/components/steps/step-sheet/DetailsTab.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/components/steps/step-sheet/SheetContent.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/survey/AccountDetailsForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/survey/form-schemas.ts (1 hunks)
- src/data/pipeline-runs/pipeline-run-graph-query.ts (0 hunks)
- src/router/Router.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/router/routes.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/types/core.ts (6 hunks)
- src/types/pipeline-deployments.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/pipeline-runs.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (5)
- .github/workflows/release.yml
- src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Info.tsx
- src/app/settings/secrets/secretsDetail/SecretDetailTable.tsx
- src/app/settings/secrets/secretsDetail/columns.tsx
- src/data/pipeline-runs/pipeline-run-graph-query.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/unit-tests.yml
- src/app/onboarding/Header.tsx
- src/components/survey/AccountDetailsForm.tsx
🔇 Additional comments not posted (96)
src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/index.tsx (3)
1-3: LGTM: Import statements updated to reflect component changes.The import statements have been appropriately updated to include the new
AlertPanelsandOrchestratorCollapsiblecomponents. The removal of theInfoCollapsibleimport (as mentioned in the AI summary) is consistent with the refactoring of the component's structure.
11-11: LGTM: OrchestratorCollapsible replaces InfoCollapsible.The
OrchestratorCollapsiblecomponent has been successfully added, replacing the previousInfoCollapsiblecomponent as mentioned in the AI summary. This change suggests a more focused presentation of orchestration-related information.To better understand the differences between
InfoCollapsibleandOrchestratorCollapsible, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare InfoCollapsible and OrchestratorCollapsible implementations # Test 1: Search for the InfoCollapsible component implementation echo "InfoCollapsible implementation:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export function InfoCollapsible() { $$$ }' # Test 2: Search for the OrchestratorCollapsible component implementation echo "OrchestratorCollapsible implementation:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export function OrchestratorCollapsible() { $$$ }'Could you please provide more context on the rationale behind this replacement and the key differences between these components?
9-9: To locate the implementation of theAlertPanelscomponent, please run the following script:# #!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the AlertPanels component # Test: Search for default export function ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export default function AlertPanels() { $$$ }' # Test: Search for class component ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export class AlertPanels extends React.Component { $$$ }' # Test: Search for exported arrow function ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'export const AlertPanels = () => { $$$ }'src/types/pipeline-deployments.ts (5)
4-4: LGTM: StepOutput type definitionThe
StepOutputtype is correctly defined and consistent with the existing pattern in the file.
5-8: LGTM: StepOutputInput type definition, but clarification neededThe
StepOutputInputtype is well-defined. However, unlike other types in this file, it's not directly mapped from thecomponentsschema.Could you please clarify the specific use case for this type and why it's defined differently from the others?
10-10: LGTM: ExternalArtifactConfig type definitionThe
ExternalArtifactConfigtype is correctly defined and consistent with the existing pattern in the file.
11-11: LGTM: ModelVersionLazyLoader type definitionThe
ModelVersionLazyLoadertype is correctly defined and consistent with the existing pattern in the file.
12-12: LGTM: ClientLazyLoader type definitionThe
ClientLazyLoadertype is correctly defined and consistent with the existing pattern in the file.src/app/settings/secrets/page.tsx (3)
13-13: Improved layout structureThe addition of a wrapping
<div>withspace-y-2class enhances the visual hierarchy and provides consistent vertical spacing between child elements. This change improves the overall structure and maintainability of the component.
16-25: Enhanced readability and visual hierarchyThe changes to the paragraph element improve the overall design:
- The smaller text size (
text-text-sm) creates a better visual hierarchy, distinguishing it from the header.- Integrating the "Learn More" link within the paragraph improves the content flow and readability.
These modifications enhance the user experience while maintaining the existing content.
13-25: Overall improvement in component structure and readabilityThe changes made to this component have significantly improved its structure, readability, and visual hierarchy. The new layout with consistent spacing, appropriate text sizing, and integrated link placement enhances the user experience while maintaining all necessary functionality.
These modifications align well with React best practices and demonstrate attention to detail in UI design. The component is now more maintainable and provides a clearer visual structure for users.
src/components/dag-visualizer/layout.ts (4)
3-3: LGTM: Explicit import of typesThe addition of explicit imports for
EdgeandNodetypes from "reactflow" improves type checking and code clarity.
6-6: Approved, but please clarify the reason for the height increaseThe increase of
artifactHeightfrom 44 to 50 is noted. While this change is likely to improve the visual representation of artifacts, could you please provide some context on why this specific adjustment was made? This information would be helpful for future maintenance and understanding of the layout decisions.
14-14: Approved, but please explain the layout adjustmentsThe changes to the graph layout settings (
ranksep: 25, nodesep: 10) are noted. These adjustments will make the graph more compact vertically and spread out horizontally. Could you please provide some context on why these specific changes were made? Understanding the reasoning behind these adjustments would be beneficial for future maintenance and potential further optimizations.
36-39: LGTM: Improved code formattingThe reformatting of the edge mapping logic enhances code readability while maintaining the same functionality. The use of a ternary operator for determining the edge type based on node count is concise and appropriate.
src/router/routes.tsx (1)
41-41: LGTM! Consider verifying related components.The addition of the
detailproperty to thesecretsobject enhances the routing capabilities for individual secret pages. This implementation is consistent with other similar patterns in the file and doesn't introduce any apparent issues.To ensure this change is properly integrated, please run the following script to check for any components or views that might need updates:
This script will help identify any components or views that might need to be updated to use the new detail route for secrets.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful! No additional components require updates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for components or views that might need updates due to the new secrets detail route # Search for files that use the secrets route echo "Files potentially affected by the new secrets detail route:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "settings/secrets" src # Search for files that might need to be updated to use the new detail route echo "\nFiles that might need to be updated to use the new detail route:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "settings/secrets/[^$]" srcLength of output: 458
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for components or views that might need updates due to the new secrets detail route # Search for files that use the secrets route echo "Files potentially affected by the new secrets detail route:" rg "settings/secrets" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' src # Search for files that might need to be updated to use the new detail route echo "\nFiles that might need to be updated to use the new detail route:" rg "settings/secrets/[^$]" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' srcLength of output: 893
src/app/settings/secrets/SecretTooltip.tsx (4)
1-6: LGTM: Appropriate imports for tooltip functionality.The imports from
@zenml-io/react-component-libraryare well-structured and provide the necessary components for creating a tooltip. The use of named imports is a good practice for optimal tree-shaking.
7-7: LGTM: Proper import of local component.The import of the
Codesnippetcomponent follows good practices, using an aliased path and adhering to React component naming conventions.
10-10: LGTM: Well-structured React function component.The
SecretTooltipcomponent is well-defined as a function component with a typed prop. The export statement makes it readily available for use throughout the application.
1-33: Overall assessment: Well-implemented and valuable new component.The
SecretTooltipcomponent is a well-structured and valuable addition to the application. It provides users with clear instructions on how to use secrets in their steps, enhancing the overall user experience. The implementation follows React best practices and makes good use of existing components and libraries.A few minor suggestions were made to further improve naming consistency and accessibility, but these are relatively small enhancements to an already solid implementation.
src/app/pipelines/RunsTab/DeleteRunAlert.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include
DeleteAlertContentBody, which is used later in the component.src/app/pipelines/PipelinesTab/DeletePipelineAlert.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include both
DeleteAlertContentandDeleteAlertContentBody. This change aligns with the new usage of these components in the file.src/app/runs/[id]/RunActionMenu.tsx (2)
13-15: LGTM! State management is well-implemented.The state management for the delete alert and dropdown menu is well-implemented using separate
useStatehooks. This approach provides clear and independent control over each UI element.
17-33:⚠️ Potential issueFix nested DropdownMenu and review modal prop usage.
The component structure is generally good, but there are a couple of issues that need attention:
- There's a nested
DropdownMenucomponent, which is likely unintentional and may cause unexpected behavior.- The
modalprop on the outerDropdownMenuis set to a boolean value, which might not be the correct usage according to the component library's documentation.To address these issues, apply the following changes:
- <DropdownMenu modal={dropdownOpen} open={dropdownOpen} onOpenChange={setDropdownOpen}> - <DropdownMenu> + <DropdownMenu open={dropdownOpen} onOpenChange={setDropdownOpen}> <DropdownMenuTrigger className="z-10"> <HorizontalDots className="h-5 w-5 shrink-0 fill-theme-text-secondary" /> <p className="sr-only">Run Actions</p> </DropdownMenuTrigger> <DropdownMenuContent className="z-10" align="end" sideOffset={1}> <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => setDeleteOpen(true)} className="space-x-2"> <Trash className="h-3 w-3 fill-neutral-400" /> <p>Delete</p> </DropdownMenuItem> </DropdownMenuContent> - </DropdownMenu> </DropdownMenu>Also, please review the documentation for the
DropdownMenucomponent to ensure correct usage of themodalprop, as it's not clear if it should accept a boolean value.To verify the correct usage of the
DropdownMenucomponent and its props, please run the following script:This will help us understand how the
DropdownMenucomponent is used elsewhere in the project and what props it accepts according to its type definitions or documentation.src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/page.tsx (3)
6-6: LGTM: CopyButton import added correctly.The import statement for the
CopyButtoncomponent has been added correctly, following the existing import style.
11-11: Good improvement on type safety.The explicit type assertion
as { secretId: string }for theuseParamshook enhances type safety and code clarity. This change will help catch potential type-related issues early in the development process.
25-25: Improved layout with updated Box className.The updated
classNamefor theBoxcomponent (space-y-5 p-5) enhances the layout by adding vertical spacing between child elements and padding. This change will improve the visual structure of the component.src/components/dag-visualizer/PreviewArtifact.tsx (3)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and relevant.The imports are logically grouped and include all necessary components and types for the
PreviewArtifactNodecomponent.
12-14: LGTM: Component declaration and props are well-defined.The
PreviewArtifactNodecomponent is properly declared with TypeScript prop typing, following React best practices.
1-39: LGTM: Component performance looks good.The
PreviewArtifactNodecomponent is lightweight and doesn't involve any heavy computations or side effects. The conditional rendering based on the status prop is simple and efficient.src/components/Infobox.tsx (3)
1-1: LGTM: New import for AlertCircle icon.The import statement for the AlertCircle icon is correctly added and follows the existing import style. This import is necessary for the new error intent functionality.
36-37: LGTM: New error case added to PrimitiveIcon function.The new case for the
errorintent is correctly implemented in thePrimitiveIconfunction. It returns theAlertCircleicon with styling consistent with other icon styles in the function.
Line range hint
1-41: Summary: Successful implementation of error intent for InfoBox component.The changes in this file consistently implement the new error intent functionality for the InfoBox component. The implementation includes:
- Importing the necessary AlertCircle icon.
- Adding an error variant to the infoBoxVariants object.
- Implementing the error case in the PrimitiveIcon function.
These changes enhance the component's flexibility by allowing it to display error states, which aligns with the PR objectives.
To ensure the new error intent is used correctly throughout the codebase, run the following script:
This script will help identify any places where the new error intent is being used and if there are any remaining TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox components.
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
intent="error"is correctly implemented and utilized.The
InfoBoxcomponent's newerrorintent has been successfully implemented and is used appropriately in the codebase. Specifically:
- Found usage in
src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/AlertPanels.tsx:<InfoBox className="truncate" intent="error">No TODOs related to error handling in
InfoBoxwere detected, ensuring that the implementation is complete and consistent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new error intent for InfoBox component # Test: Search for InfoBox usage with error intent echo "Searching for InfoBox usage with error intent:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'InfoBox.*intent="error"' # Test: Search for any TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox echo "Searching for TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox:" rg --type typescript --type tsx 'TODO.*InfoBox.*error'Length of output: 414
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new error intent for InfoBox component # Test: Search for InfoBox usage with error intent echo "Searching for InfoBox usage with error intent:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'InfoBox.*intent="error"' # Test: Search for any TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox echo "Searching for TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'TODO.*InfoBox.*error'Length of output: 384
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new error intent for InfoBox component # Test: Search for InfoBox usage with error intent in .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for InfoBox usage with error intent in .ts and .tsx files:" rg 'InfoBox.*intent="error"' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test: Search for any TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox within .ts and .tsx files echo "Searching for TODOs related to error handling in InfoBox within .ts and .tsx files:" rg 'TODO.*InfoBox.*error' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 537
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive verification of InfoBox component usage with intent props # Test: Search for InfoBox usage with intent="error" allowing flexible spacing and quotes echo "Searching for InfoBox usage with intent=\"error\":" rg 'InfoBox\s*[^>]*intent\s*=\s*["'\'']error["'\'']' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test: Search for all InfoBox usages to review intent props manually echo "Searching for all InfoBox usages to review intent props:" rg 'InfoBox\s*[^>]*intent\s*=\s*["'\''].*?["'\'']' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test: Search for any TODOs related to InfoBox usage echo "Searching for TODOs related to InfoBox usage:" rg 'TODO.*InfoBox' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1518
src/components/dag-visualizer/PreviewStep.tsx (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and appropriate.The imports are correctly organized and include all necessary components and types for the
PreviewStepNodecomponent. The use of destructured imports from the react-component-library is a good practice for better code readability and potentially smaller bundle size.
12-39: LGTM: Well-structured React component with proper TypeScript usage.The
PreviewStepNodecomponent is well-structured:
- It uses function component syntax with TypeScript prop types.
- Props are correctly destructured with appropriate type annotations.
- The component is logically organized, wrapped in a
BaseNode, and utilizes aTooltipProviderfor enhanced functionality.This structure follows React best practices and enhances maintainability.
src/app/runs/[id]/Header.tsx (4)
9-9: LGTM: New import statement for RunActionsMenuThe import statement for
RunActionsMenuis correctly added and follows React conventions.
27-27: LGTM: Enhanced layout with justify-betweenThe addition of
justify-betweento the PageHeader's className improves the layout by distributing space between child elements, pushing them to the edges of the container. This change enhances the overall structure of the header.
Line range hint
1-48: Overall assessment: Improved header layout and functionalityThe changes to this file successfully enhance the header component by improving its layout and integrating the new RunActionsMenu. The modifications align well with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The code is clean and follows React best practices.
45-45: LGTM: RunActionsMenu integrationThe RunActionsMenu component has been successfully integrated into the header, enhancing its functionality as mentioned in the PR summary.
Please verify if RunActionsMenu requires any props. If it does, ensure they are properly passed. Run the following script to check the component's definition:
src/components/dag-visualizer/Controls.tsx (4)
1-7: LGTM: Import statements rearranged.The import statements have been reorganized, which improves code readability without affecting functionality.
8-10: Approved: Props type updated to use refetch function.The
Propstype has been updated to replacerunId: stringwithrefetch: () => void. This change shifts the responsibility of data fetching to the parent component, promoting a more declarative approach and potentially improving the component's reusability.
11-11: LGTM: DagControls function signature updated.The
DagControlsfunction signature has been updated to userefetchinstead ofrunId, which is consistent with the Props type change. The rest of the component's structure remains intact, preserving existing functionality.
Line range hint
1-58: Summary: Improved component design with better separation of concerns.The changes made to the
DagControlscomponent represent a significant improvement in its design:
- The shift from using
runIdto arefetchfunction promotes better separation of concerns.- The component is now more reusable as it's not tightly coupled to specific data fetching logic.
- The changes maintain existing functionality while simplifying the component's internal logic.
These modifications align well with React best practices and should make the component easier to maintain and test.
src/components/dag-visualizer/StepNode.tsx (3)
1-2: LGTM: Import changes look good.The import of the
Steptype andclsxutility are appropriate for the changes made in the component. TheSteptype likely provides better type safety, andclsxis a good choice for managing conditional class names.
12-12: Verify the impact of the type change.The change from
StepNodeDetailstoStepin the function signature is consistent with the import on line 1. This is likely an improvement in type definition.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
StepNodeDetails:If this search returns any results, those occurrences may need to be updated to use the new
Steptype.✅ Verification successful
Type Change Verified Successfully.
No remaining uses of
StepNodeDetailswere found in the codebase. The type change fromStepNodeDetailstoStephas been successfully verified.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of StepNodeDetails # Test: Search for StepNodeDetails in TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx}' --type ts --type js 'StepNodeDetails'Length of output: 1549
26-26: Verify the availability ofdata.id.The change from
data.execution_idtodata.idfor thestepIdprop is noted. This likely reflects an update in the data structure of theSteptype.To ensure this change is consistent and
data.idis always available, please run the following script:Review the results to confirm that:
- All occurrences of
data.execution_idhave been updated todata.idwhere appropriate.- The
Steptype definition includes anidfield.✅ Verification successful
Change Verified:
data.idis consistently used anddata.execution_idis no longer present.The replacement from
data.execution_idtodata.idhas been successfully verified across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the usage of data.id and data.execution_id in Step-related components # Test: Search for uses of data.id and data.execution_id in TypeScript files rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' --type ts '(data\.id|data\.execution_id)' src/Length of output: 1549
src/app/settings/secrets/SecretsTable.tsx (3)
Line range hint
1-58: Overall, good simplification. Ensure thorough testing of SecretsTable functionality.The changes to this component represent a positive simplification, moving towards a more declarative approach in defining and using table columns. This aligns well with modern React practices and should improve code maintainability.
However, given the removal of navigation-related code (as mentioned in the AI summary), it's crucial to ensure that all necessary functionality for interacting with the secrets table is still intact.
Please consider the following:
- Thoroughly test the SecretsTable component to ensure all expected interactions are still working correctly.
- If any navigation functionality was removed, verify that it's either no longer needed or has been appropriately relocated elsewhere in the application.
- Update any relevant documentation or comments to reflect these architectural changes.
To assist in verifying the overall functionality, please run the following script:
This will help ensure that all necessary tests are in place and that the changes haven't inadvertently affected other parts of the application.
45-45: LGTM! Verify removal of navigation-related functionality.The change simplifies the
DataTablecomponent by directly usingsecretsColumnsinstead of callinggetSecretColumns(navigate). This is consistent with the import statement modification and aligns with modern React practices.To ensure no critical navigation functionality was inadvertently removed, please run the following script:
9-9: LGTM! Consider verifying thecolumns.tsfile.The change from importing
getSecretColumnstosecretsColumnssuggests a move towards a more declarative approach in defining table columns, which can simplify the code. This aligns well with modern React practices.To ensure this change is consistent, please run the following script to check the
columns.tsfile:src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/SecretDetailTable.tsx (2)
1-15: LGTM: Imports and component declaration are well-structured.The import statements are organized clearly, and the component is properly declared with TypeScript prop typing. This setup provides a good foundation for the component's functionality and maintainability.
1-65: Overall, excellent implementation of the SecretDetailTable component.This component is well-structured, follows React best practices, and provides a good user experience. It effectively handles data fetching, state management, and rendering of secret details with search and edit capabilities.
Key strengths:
- Proper use of React Query for data fetching
- Efficient state management
- Good error and loading state handling
- Reusable and modular code structure
The minor suggestions provided earlier (type safety, accessibility, and pagination consideration) would further enhance this already solid implementation.
src/app/runs/[id]/DeleteRunAlert.tsx (2)
1-13: LGTM: Imports and type definition are well-structured.The imports cover all necessary dependencies for the component's functionality. The
Propstype is correctly defined with appropriate types for its properties.
47-61: LGTM: Render logic is clear and appropriate.The component's render logic is well-structured and follows its intended purpose. The AlertDialog and its content are properly configured with the necessary props and warning messages.
src/components/dag-visualizer/ArtifactNode.tsx (2)
30-30: LGTM! Verify the existence of theidproperty.The change from
data.execution_idtodata.idfor theartifactVersionIdprop looks good. This aligns with the updated data structure.To ensure the
idproperty exists on all artifact versions, please run the following check:
38-38: LGTM! Verify the existence of thebody.typeproperty.The change to use
data.body?.type || "BaseArtifact"for theartifactTypeprop is a good improvement. It handles potential undefined values and provides a default.To ensure the
body.typeproperty exists on artifact versions where expected, please run the following check:src/components/DeleteAlertDialog.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import changes are appropriate.The additions of
ReactNodeandcnto the imports are consistent with the changes made in the component.ReactNodeis used for typing the newchildrenprop, andcnis utilized in the newDeleteAlertContentBodycomponent.Also applies to: 11-11
Line range hint
1-77: Summary: Improved component flexibility and reusability.The changes to this file have significantly enhanced the
DeleteAlertContentcomponent by allowing custom content to be passed as children. The addition of theDeleteAlertContentBodycomponent provides a consistent way to style the body content of alert dialogs. These changes improve the overall flexibility and reusability of the components, aligning well with React best practices.The minor suggestions provided (adding a default value for
childreninDeleteAlertContentand specifying thechildrentype inDeleteAlertContentBody) would further improve type safety and backwards compatibility. Overall, these changes represent a positive evolution of the component's design.src/app/settings/secrets/[id]/columns.tsx (1)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow good practices.The imports are well-organized and include necessary components and icons. Using SVG icons as React components is a good practice for maintainability. The use of @tanstack/react-table suggests a robust table implementation.
package.json (1)
67-67: LGTM: ESLint plugin updateThe update of
eslint-plugin-react-refreshfrom^0.4.5to^0.4.6is a minor patch version increment. This type of update typically includes bug fixes or small improvements and is generally safe to apply.src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/AlertPanels.tsx (1)
1-5: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and necessary.The import statements are correctly structured, following a common convention of external libraries first, followed by local imports. All imported items appear to be necessary for the component's functionality.
src/app/pipelines/RunsTab/RunDropdown.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include the new
DeleteAlertContentBodycomponent, which is used later in the file.src/components/survey/form-schemas.ts (1)
7-7: Approval: Stricter validation for fullName fieldThe change from
z.union([z.string(), z.literal("")])toz.string().min(1)for thefullNamefield is a good improvement. It ensures that users provide at least some input for their full name, which aligns with best practices for form validation and improves data quality.To ensure this change is properly implemented and doesn't cause issues, please consider the following:
- Update any frontend validation to match this new requirement.
- Check if there's any existing data with empty full names and create a migration plan if necessary.
- Update error messages in the UI to clearly communicate that a non-empty full name is required.
- Verify that this change doesn't break any existing functionality or API integrations.
To help with verification, you can run the following script to check for any potential issues:
This script will help identify potential areas that might need attention due to this change.
src/app/pipelines/PipelinesTab/PipelineDropdown.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been properly updated to include
DeleteAlertContentBody, which is consistent with its usage in the component.src/components/dag-visualizer/SmartEdge.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been appropriately updated to include
BaseEdge, which is consistent with its usage in the modified implementation.
80-80: LGTM: Simplified edge rendering logicThe change to use
BaseEdgecomponent directly simplifies the rendering logic and is consistent with the updated import statement. This modification potentially improves performance and readability while maintaining functionality.To ensure this change doesn't affect existing styles or behaviors, please verify:
- The visual appearance of the edges in the DAG visualizer remains consistent with the previous implementation.
- Any custom styling or event handling previously applied to the
pathelement is still functional withBaseEdge.Run the following script to check for any custom styling or event handlers that might need adjustment:
If the script returns any results, please review those occurrences to ensure they're compatible with the new
BaseEdgeimplementation.src/app/settings/secrets/columns.tsx (4)
6-6: LGTM: New imports for enhanced functionalityThe addition of
routesandLinkimports is appropriate for the new implementation. Using a centralized routing configuration (routes) is a good practice for maintaining consistent navigation throughout the application.Also applies to: 10-10
55-90: LGTM: Consistent updates to other columnsThe changes to the "Author", "Created At", and "Admin Actions" columns are consistent with the new constant structure. The core functionality of these columns is preserved, maintaining the overall integrity of the table.
14-14: LGTM: Simplified column definition structureConverting
getSecretColumnsfunction to asecretsColumnsconstant simplifies the code and removes the dependency on theNavigateFunctionparameter. This change improves code readability and maintainability.To ensure that navigation still works correctly after removing the
NavigateFunctionparameter, please run the following script:
12-12: LGTM: New SecretTooltip component importThe addition of the
SecretTooltipimport enhances the functionality of the secrets table. This modular approach improves code organization.To ensure the
SecretTooltipcomponent exists and is implemented correctly, please run the following script:src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Orchestrator.tsx (1)
1-102: Overall, excellent implementation of the OrchestratorCollapsible component.The component is well-structured, follows React best practices, and provides a good user experience. It handles data fetching, loading states, and error conditions effectively. The UI is intuitive with collapsible panels and copy functionality.
The minor suggestions provided (import grouping, type safety, and accessibility improvements) are enhancements that can be considered for future iterations.
Great job on this implementation!
src/components/steps/step-sheet/SheetContent.tsx (2)
24-24: LGTM! Verify theDetailsTabfile structure.The import changes look good. The
OrchestratorCardcomponent is now imported, which aligns with its usage in the "overview" tab. Additionally,StepDetailsTabis now imported from the same file.To ensure the
DetailsTabfile structure is correct, please run the following script:
106-109: LGTM! Verify theOrchestratorCardcomponent's purpose and implementation.The changes to the "overview" tab content look good:
- The addition of the
space-y-5class improves the spacing between child elements.- The inclusion of the
OrchestratorCardcomponent adds new functionality to the overview tab.- Removing the
divwrapper aroundStackCollapsiblesimplifies the structure without losing functionality.To ensure the
OrchestratorCardcomponent is correctly implemented and its purpose is clear, please run the following script:src/app/runs/[id]/_Tabs/Overview/Details.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM: New imports are correctly added.The new imports for the Info icon, RepoBadge component, and tooltip-related components are correctly added and necessary for the new functionality introduced in this component.
Also applies to: 4-4, 10-10, 20-24
105-131: LGTM: Repository/Commit information is well-implemented.The new Repository/Commit key-value pair is correctly implemented with the following good practices:
- Informative tooltip for better user understanding.
- Conditional rendering to handle cases where data is not available.
- Use of the RepoBadge component for consistent UI.
132-155: LGTM: Code Path information is well-implemented.The new Code Path key-value pair is correctly implemented with the following good practices:
- Informative tooltip for better user understanding.
- Conditional rendering to handle cases where data is not available.
- Use of the Codesnippet component for proper formatting of the code path.
- Appropriate column spanning for better layout when code path is available.
src/components/steps/step-sheet/DetailsTab.tsx (2)
9-9: LGTM: Import statements updated correctly.The new import for
MetadataMapand the addition ofuseParamsare appropriate for the changes made in this file. These updates support the newOrchestratorCardcomponent and its functionality.Also applies to: 19-19
Line range hint
31-224: LGTM: StepDetailsTab component remains unchanged and functional.The
StepDetailsTabcomponent has been maintained without significant alterations. It continues to display relevant step and pipeline run details effectively. This aligns with the expected changes mentioned in the summary.src/types/core.ts (7)
6384-6385: LGTM: New property added to PipelineRunRequestThe addition of the
model_version_idproperty to thePipelineRunRequesttype is well-documented and consistent with the changes described in the summary. The optional nature (string | null) provides flexibility in usage.
6444-6445: LGTM: Consistent addition to PipelineRunResponseThe
model_version_idproperty has been consistently added to thePipelineRunResponsetype, matching the earlier addition toPipelineRunRequest. This maintains symmetry between request and response types.
6516-6517: LGTM: Important metadata additionThe
model_version_idproperty has been appropriately added to thePipelineRunResponseMetadatatype. This addition is crucial for tracking and auditing purposes, allowing users to easily identify which model version was used in a specific pipeline run.
8560-8561: LGTM: Extended model version tracking to step levelThe addition of the
model_version_idproperty to theStepRunRequesttype is a valuable extension. This change allows for more granular tracking of model versions at the individual step level, which can be crucial for detailed analysis and debugging of pipeline runs.
8620-8621: LGTM: Consistent addition to StepRunResponseThe
model_version_idproperty has been consistently added to theStepRunResponsetype, matching the earlier addition toStepRunRequest. This maintains symmetry between request and response types at the step level, ensuring comprehensive model version tracking throughout the execution process.
8708-8709: LGTM: Comprehensive model version tracking implementedThe addition of the
model_version_idproperty to theStepRunResponseMetadatatype completes the implementation of model version tracking across all relevant types in the pipeline and step execution process. This comprehensive approach ensures that model version information is consistently available at every stage, from requests to responses and metadata, for both pipeline runs and individual steps.These changes significantly enhance the system's ability to track and manage model versions, which is crucial for reproducibility, debugging, and auditing in machine learning workflows.
Line range hint
6384-8709: Summary: Comprehensive implementation of model version trackingThe changes in this file introduce a new optional property
model_version_idacross multiple types related to pipeline and step runs. This implementation:
- Enhances traceability by allowing explicit tracking of model versions throughout the execution process.
- Maintains consistency across request, response, and metadata types for both pipeline and step levels.
- Improves the system's capability for debugging, auditing, and ensuring reproducibility in machine learning workflows.
The changes are well-documented with clear comments and follow a consistent pattern, making them easy to understand and maintain. This update significantly improves the system's ability to manage and track model versions in a comprehensive manner.
src/types/pipeline-runs.ts (5)
1-3: Import statements are correctly addedThe imported modules and their paths are appropriate and correctly referenced.
14-19: 'ArtifactNode' and 'ArtifactNodeDetails' types are well-definedThe
ArtifactNodeDetailstype extendsArtifactVersionwith anameproperty, andArtifactNodecorrectly uses this type in itsdataproperty.
21-26: 'StepNode' type is correctly structuredThe
StepNodetype includes the necessary properties and references theSteptype appropriately in itsdataproperty.
32-36: 'ZenEdge' type is appropriately definedThe
ZenEdgetype includes all necessary properties (id,source,target) and is correctly structured.
38-40: Node type unions are properly assembledThe
RealNodeandZenNodetypes are correctly defined as unions of the respective node types, improving type flexibility and safety.src/app/runs/[id]/Dag.tsx (2)
16-18: Good inclusion of preview node types for enhanced visualizationAdding
previewStepandpreviewArtifactto the custom node types enhances the DAG visualization by supporting preview functionalities, improving user interaction and experience.
63-68: Refetch function effectively updates pipeline dataThe
refetchfunction passed toDagControlscorrectly triggers a refetch of bothpipelineRunandpipelineDeployment, ensuring that the DAG visualization stays current with the latest data.src/app/runs/[id]/useDag.tsx (1)
50-51: Review property merging betweennodeandrealNode.When merging
nodeandrealNodeobjects using spread operators, properties inrealNodemay overwrite those innode. Verify that this behavior is intentional and won't lead to unintended side effects.Run the following script to check for overlapping properties:
src/components/dag-visualizer/extract-layout.ts (1)
108-145: FunctionextractExistingNodesis well-implementedThe
extractExistingNodesfunction correctly extracts nodes from the step configuration. The logic is clear, and the implementation is concise.src/components/artifacts/artifact-node-sheet/DetailCards.tsx (3)
37-38: Loading and Error States Handled AppropriatelyThe loading and error states for
artifactVersionare properly managed using<Skeleton>and<ErrorFallback>components.
43-44: Conditional Rendering of Producer ComponentsThe
ProducerKeysandProducerStepcomponents are conditionally rendered based on the presence ofproducerRunIdandproducerId, enhancing component modularity.
125-169: Rendering Pipeline and Producer Run InformationThe
ProducerKeyscomponent correctly displays the pipeline and producer run information, including proper links, status indicators, and icons reflecting the run status.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Detailscomponent with additional metadata display and tooltips.RunActionsMenucomponent for managing run-related actions.AlertPanelscomponent to display alerts based on pipeline run status.Bug Fixes
Chores
package.jsonfor improved performance and security.