Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Instances of the FeatureServices are now used instead of only the names of the FeatureServices. #3209

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

aiakide
Copy link
Contributor

@aiakide aiakide commented Nov 20, 2024

Describe changes

I have adapted the get_feature_services function so that it returns instances of the FeaturesService class and not just a list of feature service names. In addition, the functions get_online_features and get_historical_features of the integration can now be used with a list of features / feature views as well as with a FeatureService instance.
This brings the implementation of the feast integration closer to the feast API.

I have also set the minimum version of feast to 0.12.0 to ensure that the necessary Pythom API is available from feast.

This PR closes #3180.

Pre-requisites

Please ensure you have done the following:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • If my change requires a change to docs, I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have based my new branch on develop and the open PR is targeting develop. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.
  • If my changes require changes to the dashboard, these changes are communicated/requested.

Types of changes

  • [] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (add details above)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aiakide
Copy link
Contributor Author

aiakide commented Nov 20, 2024

In addition to the FeatureService, there are other implementations that do not return/use objects, but instead use names. (e.g. zenml.integrations.feast.feature_stores.feast_feature_store.FeastFeatureStore.get_data_sources or zenml.integrations.feast.feature_stores.feast_feature_store.FeastFeatureStore.get_entities). Perhaps this should also be adapted.

@aiakide
Copy link
Contributor Author

aiakide commented Nov 20, 2024

I'm not sure how tests should be written here at zenml. In the case of feast integration, you would have to do quite a bit of mocking.

@schustmi schustmi requested a review from strickvl November 25, 2024 11:03
Copy link
Contributor

@strickvl strickvl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, assuming tests all pass...

@aiakide
Copy link
Contributor Author

aiakide commented Nov 25, 2024

LGTM, assuming tests all pass...

@strickvl When I start the tests locally with the bash script, I get the following error.

RuntimeError: The ZenML database has never been migrated with alembic before. This can happen if you are performing a direct upgrade from a really old version of ZenML. This direct upgrade path is not supported anymore. Please upgrade your ZenML installation first to 0.54.0 or an earlier version and then 
to the latest version.

I don't really understand this error.

Since I have not added any new tests and have not found any tests for the feast integration, everything should probably still work.

@aiakide aiakide force-pushed the bugfix/feast-feature.service branch 2 times, most recently from 3509ca8 to 74a7f2f Compare November 26, 2024 14:11
@schustmi
Copy link
Contributor

@aiakide This is probably because the tests are trying to run with an already existing, very old database. Which OS are you running on? There should be a zenml-test directory somewhere (I think ~/.config/zenml-test on linux, ~/Library/Application\ Support/zenml-test on MacOS) which contains this DB. If you just delete that directory, it should hopefully run as expected

@aiakide aiakide force-pushed the bugfix/feast-feature.service branch from 74a7f2f to 90b3733 Compare November 27, 2024 17:54
@aiakide
Copy link
Contributor Author

aiakide commented Nov 28, 2024

@aiakide This is probably because the tests are trying to run with an already existing, very old database. Which OS are you running on? There should be a zenml-test directory somewhere (I think ~/.config/zenml-test on linux, ~/Library/Application\ Support/zenml-test on MacOS) which contains this DB. If you just delete that directory, it should hopefully run as expected

Yes, that helped. Thanks for that :)

@aiakide aiakide force-pushed the bugfix/feast-feature.service branch from 90b3733 to fd74a2c Compare November 28, 2024 08:53
@schustmi
Copy link
Contributor

@aiakide Is this ready to merge from your side or are you still making changes?

@aiakide
Copy link
Contributor Author

aiakide commented Nov 28, 2024

@schustmi Yes, I'm done. Can be merged. 🚀

@schustmi schustmi merged commit c107805 into zenml-io:develop Nov 28, 2024
38 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants