-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
glibc: add changes to make riscv64-linux-gnu works #18803
Closed
RossComputerGuy
wants to merge
1
commit into
ziglang:master
from
ExpidusOS-archive:fix/riscv64-linux-gnu
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
#define NO_INITFINI 0 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
/* This file is automatically generated. | ||
It defines a symbol `__stub_FUNCTION' for each function | ||
in the C library which is a stub, meaning it will fail | ||
every time called, usually setting errno to ENOSYS. */ | ||
|
||
#ifdef _LIBC | ||
# error Applications may not define the macro _LIBC | ||
#endif | ||
|
||
#define __stub___compat_bdflush | ||
#define __stub___compat_create_module | ||
#define __stub___compat_get_kernel_syms | ||
#define __stub___compat_query_module | ||
#define __stub___compat_uselib | ||
#define __stub_chflags | ||
#define __stub_fchflags | ||
#define __stub_fedisableexcept | ||
#define __stub_feenableexcept | ||
#define __stub_fegetexcept | ||
#define __stub_gtty | ||
#define __stub_revoke | ||
#define __stub_setlogin | ||
#define __stub_sigreturn | ||
#define __stub_stty |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see this in upstream glibc. Should a patch be submitted?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe? Idk if we've ever sent a patch to glibc before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, something is weird here:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clang doesn't support the directive which is why we have this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
llvm/llvm-project#97222
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's definitely an oversight. The
MCStreamer
code in LLVM has an API for emitting CFI labels, it's just that theMCParser
hasn't been taught to parse them. Honestly a bit a surprised no one has run into this before as it affects ARC, C-SKY, and LoongArch too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should be able to drop this workaround in LLVM 19: llvm/llvm-project#97922
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sweet, amazing getting that done. Would that mean this PR will have to wait for the next LLVM version bump in Zig?