Skip to content

Conversation

ulmanyar
Copy link

@ulmanyar ulmanyar commented Mar 7, 2024

In the 3.5 branch the misspelled sparkfun_pro_mirco_rp2040 seems to be an out-of-date duplicate of the sparkfun_pro_micro_rp2040 with correct spelling.

In the 3.5 branch the misspelled `sparkfun_pro_mirco_rp2040` seems to be an
out-of-date duplicate of the `sparkfun_pro_micro_rp2040` with correct
spelling.

Signed-off-by: ulmanyar <[email protected]>
@petejohanson
Copy link

I'm a bit confused by the duplicate PRs with this and #30

Shouldn't we just be removing since upstream now has it with the right name?

@ulmanyar
Copy link
Author

Yeah, patch #30 is to the v3.2 branch where it's not in upstream, so I guess it kind of makes sense? But then again 3.2 isn't used by ZMK any longer? So perhaps not really necessary.

Regarding this patch, you're saying both the correctly spelled and the incorrectly spelled one can be removed since it's in upstream? But the pin assignment fixed in #28 isn't in 3.5 upstream? I opened a PR upstream on main, so I guess it needs to be cherry picked to the 3.5-branch or ZMKs v3.5.0+zmk-fixes anyway? Thank you for the patience, I'm pretty much new to this, so not on top on how things work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants