Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convert Apiary docs #4212

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Dec 28, 2023
Merged

Convert Apiary docs #4212

merged 17 commits into from
Dec 28, 2023

Conversation

zwolf
Copy link
Member

@zwolf zwolf commented Jun 13, 2023

Based on #3050, with a new branch to avoid a huge rebase.

Running and previewing locally is as simple as cd docs; docker-compose up

  • classifications
  • collection preferences
  • collection roles
  • collections
  • memberships
  • organizations
  • project preferences
  • project roles
  • set member subjects
  • subject sets
  • subject workflow statuses
  • subjects
  • user groups
  • workflows

Review checklist

  • First, the most important one: is this PR small enough that you can actually review it? Feel free to just reject a branch if the changes are hard to review due to the length of the diff.
  • If there are any migrations, will they the previous version of the app work correctly after they've been run (e.g. the don't remove columns still known about by ActiveRecord).
  • If anything changed with regards to the public API, are those changes also documented in the apiary.apib file?
  • Are all the changes covered by tests? Think about any possible edge cases that might be left untested.

@yuenmichelle1 yuenmichelle1 merged commit 4768229 into master Dec 28, 2023
8 checks passed
@yuenmichelle1 yuenmichelle1 deleted the apiary-updated branch December 28, 2023 21:17
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants