Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add PHP 8.4 to GitHub Actions test matrix #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ActuallyConnor
Copy link
Owner

@ActuallyConnor ActuallyConnor commented Nov 28, 2024

This update includes PHP 8.4 in the matrix of PHP versions used for testing in the GitHub Actions workflow. The addition ensures that the project's code is tested against the latest PHP version, enhancing compatibility and stability.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the testing workflow to include PHP version 8.4, enhancing compatibility and support for the latest PHP features.

This update includes PHP 8.4 in the matrix of PHP versions used for testing in the GitHub Actions workflow. The addition ensures that the project's code is tested against the latest PHP version, enhancing compatibility and stability.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in the .github/workflows/test.yml file. Specifically, the PHP version matrix for the unit-tests and static-analysis jobs has been expanded to include PHP version 8.4, in addition to the previously specified versions 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, and 8.3. The overall structure of the workflow remains unchanged, with both jobs continuing to run on the same Ubuntu environment.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated PHP version matrix in unit-tests and static-analysis jobs to include PHP 8.4.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New PHP 8.4 hops in today! 🐇✨
With tests and checks, we leap with glee,
A brighter future for all to see!
So let’s celebrate this joyful change,
In our workflow's dance, nothing feels strange!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

37-37: Consider separating experimental PHP versions

For better organization and clarity, consider:

  1. Moving PHP 8.4 to a separate experimental job
  2. Adding appropriate labels/badges to indicate experimental status

Here's a suggested approach:

  static-analysis:
    name: Static Analysis
    runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
    strategy:
      matrix:
-       php-versions: [ '8.0', '8.1', '8.2', '8.3', '8.4' ]
+       php-versions: [ '8.0', '8.1', '8.2', '8.3' ]

+ static-analysis-experimental:
+   name: Static Analysis (Experimental)
+   runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
+   continue-on-error: true
+   strategy:
+     matrix:
+       php-versions: [ '8.4' ]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e118a25 and 5634523.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
strategy:
matrix:
php-versions: [ '8.0', '8.1', '8.2', '8.3' ]
php-versions: [ '8.0', '8.1', '8.2', '8.3', '8.4' ]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Add continue-on-error for PHP 8.4 to handle potential incompatibilities

While composer.json allows PHP versions >=8.0 and no explicit conflicts were found in dependencies, PHP 8.4 is still in alpha stage. To prevent potential CI failures from blocking PRs while maintaining early testing:

strategy:
  matrix:
    php-versions: [ '8.0', '8.1', '8.2', '8.3', '8.4' ]
  include:
    - php-versions: '8.4'
      continue-on-error: true
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider handling PHP 8.4 as an experimental build

PHP 8.4 is currently in alpha stage and not ready for production use. While it's great to test against upcoming versions, consider:

  1. Adding continue-on-error: true for PHP 8.4 to prevent CI failures from blocking PRs
  2. Verifying composer.json PHP version constraints

Let's check the composer.json configuration:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PHP version constraints in composer.json and potential compatibility issues

# Check composer.json PHP version constraints
echo "Checking composer.json PHP version constraints:"
if [ -f "composer.json" ]; then
    cat composer.json | jq -r '.require.php'
fi

# Check if any dependencies explicitly exclude PHP 8.4
echo "Checking dependencies that might conflict with PHP 8.4:"
if [ -f "composer.lock" ]; then
    cat composer.lock | jq -r '.packages[] | select(.require.php != null) | {name: .name, php: .require.php}'
fi

Length of output: 326

@ActuallyConnor ActuallyConnor merged commit e8759de into main Nov 28, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@ActuallyConnor ActuallyConnor deleted the feature/php-8.4 branch November 28, 2024 23:58
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant