rGFA support (experimental) #1186
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds the
--rgfaoption tocactus-pangenome. It will get yougraph.rgfa.gz: Like the usual GFA file, but no paths -- only rGFA tags. These tags will cover off-reference sequence as determined by greedy cover. By default, only intervals >= 50bp are included. (graph.gfa.gzchanged to no longer have rank-0 tags)graph.rgfa.gbz: This is the usual GBZ, but with the full rGFA cover added as reference path fragments (that have special sample name_rGFA)graph.rgfa.vcf.gz: This VCF contains nested calls inside insertions by means of the rGFA cover. It does not go throughvcfbublike usual.It'd be nice to not have different GBZ/VCF outputs, but keeping them separate will make it easier to benchmark. There's also still some work needed regarding VCF tags...