-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove pollution fluid mechanic from ebf #3677
Merged
Merged
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0d4d7b3
remove pollution fluids from ebf
StaffiX 9254abf
Tooltip changes
StaffiX 60496f7
remove it from muffler
StaffiX c2bc7e3
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 756ecd0
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 44631ae
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 7674f95
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 68e0fc2
remove identical methods
StaffiX d41c9f6
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 592a7a9
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 399797e
add back hatch restriction
StaffiX 890cf4c
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master ac2dd97
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master 150dba9
Merge branch 'master' into ebf
Dream-Master e694c8f
Add back MEBF restriction
StaffiX 40570f8
update casing info
StaffiX dfa6412
add output hatch to top casing
StaffiX File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will unform all the EBFs with an output hatch on top, which is quite a lot of unformed EBFs considering it's an LV multiblock. I want it so a single output hatch can be added on top in addition to the other one on the bottom, to avoid base breaking change and to allow for a bit more flexibility for those who want to use this additional hatch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wouldn't unform any ebfs, due to the changed structure definition, but I will revert it back if it's not something wanted even after adding a minimum casing limit (which I forgot EBF doesn't have)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i want the ability to have one output hatch on top, just like before, but for all the fluid outputs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright, i added back the hatch restriction to the ebf (but i left the any casing for hatch for the mbf since it doesn't have the same logistical challenge to it).
So now it unforms if a bus or input hatch gets placed at the top, just like before.