Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MuSR: 3He Refrigerator Document VI Cryogenic Control Logic #6239

Closed
3 tasks done
JamesKingWork opened this issue Feb 16, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

MuSR: 3He Refrigerator Document VI Cryogenic Control Logic #6239

JamesKingWork opened this issue Feb 16, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@JamesKingWork
Copy link
Contributor

JamesKingWork commented Feb 16, 2021

As a MuSR scientist, I would like the cryogenic control logic for the 3He Refrigerator to be correct and approved with cryogenics.

Acceptance criteria:

  • VI Cryogenic Control logic is documented (on the dev manual)
  • The logic is approved by the cryogenics team (or is edited to match what they expect)
  • An estimate of time to implement the logic is given

Notes:

  • The 3He refrigerator is a Heliox/ITC503 based system
  • LabVIEW VIs are at C:\LabVIEW Modules\Oxford Software\Muon Heliox

3He Refrigerator tickets:

@JamesKingWork
Copy link
Contributor Author

Confirmed with cryogenics and MuSR scientists that this is purely ITC503 and doesn't use ITC502s and ITC601s as the LabVIEW suggests

@JamesKingWork
Copy link
Contributor Author

JamesKingWork commented Mar 2, 2021

Impeded waiting meeting for discussion with cryogenics on Friday. Documentation to discuss is attached here.

MuSR 3He Cryo Logic.docx

@JamesKingWork
Copy link
Contributor Author

JamesKingWork commented Mar 10, 2021

After talking to cryogenics on Friday there were a number of notable differences between my expectations from the VI and the realities of the device. I have updated the document and sent it to cryogenics to get feedback.

MuSR 3He Cryo Logic Attempt 2.docx

@JamesKingWork
Copy link
Contributor Author

See docs. After a talk today with cryogenics they have approved the logic.

@KathrynBaker
Copy link
Member

The docs make enough sense to me, and the progression of documents is visible in this ticket.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants