feat: 7.37.0 #12490
Draft
feat: 7.37.0 #12490
+772
−246
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This PR updates the change log for 7.37.0 and generates the test plan here [commit.csv](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/release/7.37.0/commits.csv) --------- Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sethkfman <[email protected]>
brianacnguyen
previously approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
…ller (#12510) - feat: implement remote feature flag controller (#12427) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> Introduction of `@metamask/remote-feature-flag-controller` library. Remote feature flag controller manages data flow, retry policy, and cache expiry. The controller consumer manages default values, data persistency, and data distribution. See [ADR](https://github.com/MetaMask/decisions/blob/b3094d47a568ac1e076a44fa704c2d29d1b59f35/decisions/wallet-platform/0001-remote-rollout-feature-flags.md) for a in-depth description ## Technical decisions ### Controller init on `Engine.ts` with feature flags fetching only on cold app starts. `@metamask/remote-feature-flag-controller` is only asked to fetch feature flags after its init in `Engine.ts`. Ensures feature flags are only fetched on cold app starts. ### Fallback values Default values are used when remote feature flags are undefined. The fallback mechanism is implemented by each feature flag selector `app/selectors/featureFlagsController/<featureFlagName>` In this PR we include `minimumAppVersion` selector, which manages the LD feature flag `mobile-minimum-versions` ### One selector per each feature flag [LD feature flags can be boolean, number, strings on JSON objects](https://docs.launchdarkly.com/sdk/concepts/flag-types#understanding-flag-types). We've decided to have each feature flag with its own selector A feature flag selector contains: - state selectors for each feature flag value. - business logic - defaults for when feature flags values are undefined. - TS types. - unit tests and mocked data. This architecture offers a clear separation between each feature flag and the logic behind it, allowing easier manipulation. Code owners are assigned to each feature flag. ### ## **Related issues** Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/mobile-planning/issues/2054 Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/mobile-planning/issues/1975 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tommasini <[email protected]> [a8c0783](a8c0783) Co-authored-by: João Loureiro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tommasini <[email protected]>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the release candidate for version 7.37.0. The changelog will be found in another PR chore/7.37.0-Changelog.
Team sign-off checklist
Reference